Interpretation of Course Conceptual Structure and Student Self- efficiency: An Integrated Strategy of Knowledge Graphs with Item Response Modeling

Author:

CAO Zhen-Yu1,LIN Feng2,FENG Chun3

Affiliation:

1. Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine

2. Nanjing Medical University

3. Tongji University

Abstract

Abstract Background A lack of studies quantitively measures the difficulty and importance of knowledge points depending on students’ self-efficacy for learning (SEL). The study aims to verify the practical use of psychological measurement tools in physical therapy education by analyzing student SEL and course conceptual structure. Methods We extracted 100 knowledge points (KPs) from the “Therapeutic Exercise” course curriculum and administered a difficulty rating questionnaire of KPs to 218 students after their final exam. The pipeline of the non-parametric IRT and parametric IRT was employed to estimate student SEL and describe the hierarchy of KPs in terms of difficulty. Additionally, Gaussian Graphical Models with Non-Convex Penalties were deployed to create a Knowledge Graph (KG) and identify the main components. Finally, a visual analytics approach was proposed to understand the correlation and difficulty level of KPs. Results We identified 50 KPs to create the Mokken scale, which exhibited high reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.9675) and showed no gender bias at the overall or each item level (p > 0.05). The three-parameter logistic model (3PLM) demonstrated good fitness with questionnaire data, whose Root Mean Square Error Approximation < 0.05. Besides, item-model fitness unveiled good fitness, as indicated by each item with non-significant p-values for chi-square tests (p > 0.05). The Wright map revealed item difficulty relative to SEL levels. SEL estimated by the 3PLM correlated significantly with the high-ability range of average Grade-Point Average (p < 0.05). The KG backbone structure consisted of 58 KPs, with 29 KPs overlapping with the Mokken scale. Visual analysis of the KG backbone structure indicated that discrimination of knowledge concepts in the IRT could not replace their position parameters in the KG, suggesting KG and IRT methods offer distinct perspectives to visualize correlations and hierarchical relationships among the KPs. Conclusion This study integrated IRT modeling and the KG method through a questionnaire on student self-perceived knowledge difficulty, quantitatively assessing student SEL and the importance of KPs. Based on real-world teaching empirical data, this study laid a research foundation for updating course contents and customizing learning objectives. Trial registration Not applicable.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3