Valproic Acid For Agitation In The Intensive Care Unit: a Retrospective Analysis Of Psychiatric Consults

Author:

White Geneviève1ORCID,Adessky Noah2,Chen Fei-Wen3,Regazzoni Anne2,Tourian Leon2,Chagnon Miguel4,Gursahaney Ashvini2,Alharbi Majed2,Williamson David5,Perreault Marc2

Affiliation:

1. CISSS de la Gaspésie

2. McGill University Health Centre

3. CIUSSS Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal

4. Université de Montréal: Universite de Montreal

5. Sacred Heart Hospital of Montreal: Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal

Abstract

Abstract Background Agitation is a common clinical problem encountered in the intensive care unit (ICU). Treatment options are based on clinical experience and sparse quality literature. Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of valproic acid (VPA) as adjuvant treatment for agitation in the ICU as well as to identify independent predictors of response. Method This retrospective single center observational study evaluated adult patients admitted to the ICU for whom a psychiatric consultation was requested for agitation management, with agitation defined as a Richmond Agitation Sedation Score of 2 or greater. A descriptive analysis of the proportion of agitation-free patients per day of follow-up, the incidence of agitation-related-events, as well as the evolution of co-medications use over time are presented. A logistic regression model was used to assess predictors of VPA response, defined as being agitation-free on Day 7 and GEE models were used to evaluate the independent effect of VPA as adjuvant therapy for agitation in the critically ill. Results One hundred seventy-five (175) patients were included in the study with 78 receiving VPA. The percentage of agitation-free patients was 6.5% (5/77) on Day 1, 14.1% (11/78) on Day 3 and 39.5% (30/76) on Day 7. Multivariate regression model for clinical and demographic variables identified female gender as predictor of response on Day 7 (OR 6.10 [1.18–31.64], p = 0.03). The independent effect of VPA was non-significant when compared to a control group. Conclusion Although VPA used as adjuvant treatment was associated with a decrease in agitation, its effect when compared to a control group did not yield significant results.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3