Comparative Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of approved Oral Therapies for Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Author:

He Wenjuan1ORCID,Huang Guangliang2,Cui Wenyan2,Tian Yunfei3,Sun Qian1,Zhao Xiaojuan1,Zhao Yonghong1,Li Dan1,Liu Xiuju1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University

2. Hebei Medical University

3. The University of Hong Kong

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To compare the effectiveness and safety of marketed oral drugs for the treatment of overactive bladder. Methods Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials databases were systematically searched. The search time frame was from database creation to June 2, 2022, and randomized controlled double-blind trials of oral drugs for overactive bladder were screened. Trials were evaluated for quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool, and data were statistically analyzed using Stata 16.0 to compare and rank differences in effectiveness and safety. Result A total of 60 randomized controlled double-blind trials were included. Solifenacin 10mg was the most effective in micturitions and incontinence episodes, solifenacin 5/10mg in urgency and nocturia, fesoterodine 8mg in urgency incontinence and oxybutynin 5mg in voided volume/micturition. For safety, mirabegron, vibegron, solifenacin 5mg, extended-release tolterodine 4mg and extended-release oxybutynin 10mg all showed a better incidence of dry mouth; Compared to placebo, only imidafenacin 0.1mg, showed a significantly increased incidence in hypertension, solifenacin 10mg in urinary tract infection, fesoterodine 4/8mg and controlled release darifenacin 15mg in headache. Conclusion Solifenacin showed better efficacy. For safety, most anticholinergics were more likely to cause dry mouth and constipation, while β-adrenergic agonists showed an increased incidence of nasopharyngitis. The choice of therapeutic agent should be tailored to the patient's situation in order to find the best balance between efficacy and safety.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3