Affiliation:
1. University of the Sunshine Coast
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives: Sexuality is a key domain of wellbeing that is significantly compromised by SCI but often left unaddressed during rehabilitation, with a typical focus being genital functioning and fertility. Using a theory-driven qualitative methodology and applying Material, Discursive, Intrapsychic Theory (encompassing multiple dimensions of sexuality), this study explored the support experiences of nine Australian adults with an SCI.
Design: This qualitative methodology took a deductive, critical and constructionist theoretical perspective, which prioritised the collection of information-rich data over acquiring a large sample size, and utilised a contextual approach to understanding the facets of sexual wellbeing.
Setting & Methods: Male (N = 8) and female (N = 1) participants with varying levels of SCI completed an online interview which was primarily participant-led.
Results: Participants’ responses reflected previous research on sexuality in SCI, noting an emphasis on physical aspects (e.g., erection and ejaculation ability) to the neglect of the psychological and interpersonal. The three core components of Material, Discursive, Intrapsychic Theory were mapped onto themes from the data, with multiple sub-themes comprised in each, demonstrating that aspects aside from sensation loss like gender identity, self-confidence, and disability stereotypes all effect sexual wellbeing. An additional fourth theme of relationship dynamics was also identified, including aspects such as connectedness and perceived safety in relationships.
Conclusions: This provides practical implications for support experiences such as the inclusion of partner support in rehabilitation. Further investigation is recommended to provide specific interventions for regaining sexuality in the context of a SCI.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. Psychosocial aspects of health-related quality of life and the association with patient-reported bladder symptoms and satisfaction after spinal cord injury;Moghalu O;Spinal Cord,2021
2. World Health Organization. (2013). Spinal cord injury. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/spinal-cordinjury
3. Norton, L. (2010). Spinal Cord Injury, Australia 2007-08. Australian Institiute of Health and Welfare: Canberra.
4. Estimating the incidence and prevalence of traumatic spinal cord injury in Australia;New PW;Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,2015
5. Direct Cost of Illness for Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review;Malekzadeh H;Global Spine Journal,2021