Baseline levels and longitudinal rates of change in plasma Aβ42/40 among self-identified Black/African American and White individuals

Author:

Xiong Chengjie1,Schindler Suzanne2,Luo Jingqin1ORCID,Morris John3,Bateman Randall1ORCID,Holtzman David1ORCID,Cruchaga Carlos2ORCID,Babulal Ganesh2,Henson Rachel2,Benzinger Tammie1ORCID,Bui Quoc2,Agboola Folasade2,Grant Elizabeth2,Gremminger Emily2,Moulder Krista2,Geldmacher David4,Clay Olivio4,Roberson Erik5ORCID,Murchison Charles4,Wolk David6,Shaw Leslie7

Affiliation:

1. Washington University in St. Louis

2. Washington University School of Medicine

3. Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center

4. University of Alabama Birmingham

5. University of Alabama at Birmingham

6. Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania

7. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania

Abstract

Abstract Objective: The use of blood-based biomarkers of Alzheimer disease (AD) may facilitate access to biomarker testing of groups that have been historically under-represented in research. We evaluated whether plasma Aβ42/40 has similar or different baseline levels and longitudinal rates of change in participants racialized as Black or White. Methods: The Study of Race to Understand Alzheimer Biomarkers (SORTOUT-AB) is a multi-center longitudinal study to evaluate for potential differences in AD biomarkers between individuals racialized as Black or White. Plasma samples collected at three AD Research Centers (Washington University, University of Pennsylvania, and University of Alabama-Birmingham) underwent analysis with C2N Diagnostics’ PrecivityAD™ blood test for Aβ42 and Aβ40. General linear mixed effects models were used to estimate the baseline levels and rates of longitudinal change for plasma Aβ measures in both racial groups. Analyses also examined whether dementia status, age, sex, education, APOE ε4 carrier status, medical comorbidities, or fasting status modified potential racial differences. Results: Of the 324 Black and 1,547 White participants, there were 158 Black and 759 White participants with plasma Aβ measures from at least two longitudinal samples over a mean interval of 6.62 years. At baseline, the group of Black participants had lower levels of plasma Aβ40 but similar levels of plasma Aβ42 as compared to the group of White participants. As a result, baseline plasma Aβ42/40 levels were higher in the Black group than the White group, consistent with the Black group having lower levels of amyloid pathology. Racial differences in plasma Aβ42/40 were not modified by age, sex, education, APOE ε4 carrier status, medical conditions (hypertension and diabetes), or fasting status. Despite differences in baseline levels, the Black and White groups had a similar longitudinal rate of change in plasma Aβ42/40. Interpretation: Black individuals participating in AD research studies had a higher mean level of plasma Aβ42/40, consistent with a lower level of amyloid pathology, which, if confirmed, may imply a lower proportion of Black individuals being eligible for AD clinical trials in which the presence of amyloid is a prerequisite. However, there was no significant racial difference in the rate of change in plasma Aβ42/40, suggesting that amyloid pathology accumulates similarly across racialized groups.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference58 articles.

1. The role of cerebrospinal fluid and other biomarker modalities in the Alzheimer's disease diagnostic revolution;Schindler SE;Nat Aging,2023

2. Detection and treatment of Alzheimer's disease in its preclinical stage;Rafii MS;Nat Aging,2023

3. Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease-preparing for a new era of disease-modifying therapies;Zetterberg H;Mol Psychiatry

4. Blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: Current state and future use in a transformed global healthcare landscape;Hampel H;Neuron,2023

5. Blood biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in clinical practice and trials;Hansson O;Nat Aging,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3