High uterosacral ligament suspension by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery or laparoendoscopic surgery for uterine prolapse: a protocol for a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

Author:

Hou Tao1,Chen Li1,He Shan1,Huang Lishan1,Zhou Ping1,Chen Yang1,Liang Ye1,Zhong Qijun1,He Wen1

Affiliation:

1. Meizhou People's Hospital

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Uterine prolapse is a prevalent health condition that significantly impairs the daily activities and quality of life of women. High uterosacral ligament suspension (HULS) through conventional laparoscopy (cLap) is a frequently employed surgical procedure for treating uterine prolapse. In recent years, gynecological surgeons have increasingly considered transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) due to its favorable outcomes, including enhanced cosmetic appearance and expedited postoperative recovery. However, there is a lack of studies comparing the techniques of vNOTES-HULS and cLap-HULS. Therefore, this trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of vNOTES-HULS and cLap-HULS for the treatment of uterine prolapse at stage 2 or higher, providing valuable insights for surgical decision-making. Methods A two-arm, single-center, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted to evaluate whether the vNOTES-HULS procedure is non-inferior to the cLap-HULS procedure in the repair of uterine prolapse. The study aims to recruit a total of 116 patients diagnosed with stage 2 or above uterine prolapse from Meizhou People's Hospital. These patients will be randomly allocated to either the vNOTES-HULS or cLap-HULS intervention. The primary objective of the study is to determine the rate of successful uterine prolapse treatment during the 1-year follow-up evaluation. Secondary outcomes include perioperative parameters, complications, costs, postoperative recovery, and quality of life assessed at 1-month, 1-year, and 5-year intervals. Discussion This study aims to compare the effectiveness of vNOTES-HULS and cLap-HULS in the treatment of stage II or higher uterine prolapse based on the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification classification. Trial registration: The study protocol received approval from the Research Ethics Committee of the Meizhou People’s Hospital (No. 2022-C-23) on October 3, 2022. It was registered into the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry on September 6, 2022 (no. ChiCTR2200063408). This study is currently in progress.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference21 articles.

1. 中华医学会妇产科学分会妇科盆底学组. : 盆腔器官脱垂的中国诊治指南(2020年版). 中华妇产科杂志 2020, 55(5):300–306.

2. Burden of pelvic organ prolapse in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Gedefaw G;BMC Womens Health,2020

3. An epidemiologic study of pelvic organ prolapse in rural Chinese women: a population-based sample in China;Li Z;Int Urogynecol J,2019

4. Native tissue repair versus mesh repair in pelvic organ prolapse surgery;Kalkan U;Climacteric: the journal of the International Menopause Society,2017

5. Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse;Altman D;N Engl J Med,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3