Prevalence and Imaging-Based Classification of Pituitary Adenomas with Hard Consistency: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Gaia Felipe1,Pokorny Gabriel2,Cortez Gustavo M3,Zymberg Samuel Tau4,Cruz Oswaldo Laércio Mendonça4

Affiliation:

1. Universidade do Oeste Paulista Hospital Regional de Presidente

2. Instituto de Patologia da Coluna

3. Baptist Neurological Institute

4. Universidade Federal de São Paulo

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVE Transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas can be challenging in patients with tumors with a hard consistency. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to identify the true incidence and the performance of radiological findings in identifying pituitary adenomas with a hard consistency.METHODS A literature search was conducted and included studies that compared intraoperative pituitary tumor consistency and pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Using random-effects meta-analysis and univariate analysis, we evaluate the prevalence of hard pituitary tumors.RESULTS Of studies the 916 studies, 888 studies were excluded. Finally, 28 studies harboring 1116 patients with pituitary tumors were included. Of them, hard-consistency tumors were intraoperatively adjudicated in 219 patients (weighted incidence of 16,82%,95% CI, 12.35–22.48%; I2 = 65,1%). Seventeen (60%) reported a relation between radiological findings and intraoperative tumor consistency in at least one MRI sequence, with a weighted proportion of 15%, 95% CI, 10,31% − 22,70%). Apparent diffusion correlation(ADC), and T2-weighted sequences were associated with tumor consistency in 31% and 53% of the studies, respectively. Nonetheless, conflicting signal intensities across the studies precluded conventional MRI sequences from accurately predicting pituitary tumor consistency.CONCLUSION The weighted incidence of pituitary tumors adjudicated as having a hard consistency was 16% in the present sample of studies.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3