Prevalence and Imaging-Based Classification of Pituitary Adenomas with Hard Consistency: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Gaia Felipe1,Pokorny Gabriel2,Cortez Gustavo M3,Zymberg Samuel Tau4,Cruz Oswaldo Laércio Mendonça4

Affiliation:

1. Universidade do Oeste Paulista Hospital Regional de Presidente

2. Instituto de Patologia da Coluna

3. Baptist Neurological Institute

4. Universidade Federal de São Paulo

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVE Transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas may be difficult in patients with hard tumors. To determine the genuine incidence and performance of radiological features in diagnosing pituitary adenomas with hard consistency, we conducted a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of the literature. METHODS A literature search was conducted and publications comparing intraoperative pituitary tumor consistency and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included. The authors assessed the prevalence of hard pituitary tumors using a random-effects meta-analysis and univariate analysis. RESULTS Of 916 studies, 888 were excluded. Finally, 28 trials with 1116 patients with pituitary tumors were considered. Hard-consistency tumors were adjudicated intraoperatively in 219 patients (weighted incidence, 16.82%; 95% CI, 12.35-22.48%, I2 = 65.1%). With a weighted proportion of 15%, 17 studies (60%) demonstrated a link between radiological results and intraoperative tumor consistency in at least one MRI sequence (95% CI, 10,31% - 22,70%). In 31% and 53% of the trials, apparent diffusion correlation (ADC) and T2-weighted sequences were linked to tumor consistency. Nonetheless, inconsistent signal intensities across trials make it impossible for conventional MRI sequences to correctly estimate pituitary tumor consistency. CONCLUSION In the current study population, the weighted incidence of pituitary tumors classified as having a hard consistency was 16%.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3