Molecular Characterization of Glaesserella parasuis Strains Circulating in North American Swine Production Systems
Author:
Mugabi Robert1, Silva Ana Paula S. Poeta1, Hu Xiao1, Gottschalk Marcelo2, Aragon Virginia3, Macedo Nubia R.1, Sahin Orhan1, Harms Perry4, Main Rodger1, Tucker Alexander W.5, Li Ganwu1, Clavijo Maria J.1
Affiliation:
1. Iowa State University 2. Université de Montréal 3. Unitat Mixta d’Investigació IRTA-UAB en Sanitat Animal, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB) 4. PIC North America 5. University of Cambridge
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Glaesserella parasuis is the causative agent of Glässer’s disease in pigs. Serotyping is the most common method used to type G. parasuis isolates. However, the high number of non-typables (NT) and low discriminatory power make serotyping problematic. In this study, 218 field clinical isolates and 15 G. parasuis reference strains were whole-genome sequenced (WGS). Multilocus sequence types (MLST), serotypes, core-genome phylogeny, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes, and putative virulence genes were determined.
Results
In silico WGS serotyping revealed 11 of 15 serotypes. The most frequently detected serotypes were 7, 13, 4, and 2. MLST identified 72 sequence types (STs) (66 novel). The most predominant ST was novel ST454. At least one group 1 vtaA virulence gene was observed in all isolates, except for serotype 8 (ST299 and ST406), 15 (ST408 and ST552) and NT (ST448). A few group 1 vtaA genes were significantly associated with certain serotypes or STs. Core-genome phylogeny depicted 3 primary lineages (LI, LII, and LIII), with LIIIA sublineage isolates lacking all vtaA genes.
Conclusion
This study showed the use of WGS to type G. parasuis isolates and can be considered an alternative to the more labor-intensive and traditional serotyping and standard MLST. Core-genome phylogeny provided the best strain discrimination. The presence of other putative virulence factors and AMR genes was also explored. These findings will lead to a better understanding of the molecular epidemiology and virulence in G. parasuis that can be applied to the future development of diagnostic tools, autogenous vaccines, evaluation of antibiotic use, prevention, and disease control.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. Aragon V, Segales J, Tucker AW. Glässer’s disease. In: Zimmerman JJ, Karriker LA, Ramirez A, Schwartz K, Stevenson GW, Zhang J, editors. Diseases of Swine. Ames: Wiley-Blackwell; 2019. pp. 844–52. 2. Experimental reproduction of Haemophilus parasuis infection in swine: clinical, bacteriologic, and morphologic findings;Vahle JL;J Vet Diagn Invest,1995 3. Virulence and draft genome sequence overview of multiple strains of the swine pathogen Haemophilus parasuis;Brockmeier SL;PLoS ONE,2014 4. Poeta Silva AP, Schwartz K, Arruda B, Burrough E, Santos J, Macedo N, Sahin O, Harmon K, Siepker C, Gauger P, Sitthicharoenchai P, Rahe M, Magstadt D, Michael A, Pineyro P, Derscheid R, Main R, Fano E, Clavijo M. Diagnostic trends of five swine endemic bacterial pathogens using data from the Iowa State University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory (2010–2019). In proceedings: 2021; 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Association of Swine Veterinarians (AASV), Atlanta, Georgia, USA., San Francisco, California, USA (Virtual meeting). 5. Kielstein P, Rapp-Gabrielson VJ. 1992. Designation of 15 serovars of Haemophilus parasuis on the basis of immunodiffusion using heat-stable antigen extracts. J Clin Microbiol. 1992; 30(4):862-5. Doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.4.862-865.1992
|
|