Comparison of unipedicular and bipedicular kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the lower lumbar spine

Author:

Qian Yunfan1,Li Yimin1,Shen Guangjie1,Tang Chengxuan1,Zhong Xiqiang1,He Shaoqi1

Affiliation:

1. Third affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

Abstract

Abstract Background Both unipedicular and bipedicular approaches for percutaneous kyphoplasty are reportedly effective for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). However, most of the literature has reported on thoracolumbar fractures, with few reports describing the treatment of the lower lumbar spine. This study compared the clinical and radiological results between the unipedicular versus bipedicular approachesfor percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of 160 patients who underwent percutaneous kyphoplasty for lower lumbar (L3­–L5) osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures between January 2016 and January 2020. Patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, operation time, blood lose, clinical and radiological features, and complications were compared between the two groups. Cement leakage, height restoration, and cement distribution were calculated from the radiographs. Visual pain analog scale (VAS), the Oswestry disability index (ODI), were calculated before surgery and immediately and 2 years after surgery. Results The results showed significantly improved the visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, and vertebral height restoration in each group (p<0.05), with no significant differences between the two groups (p>0.05). The mean operation time and blood lose in the unipedicular group was less than that in the bipedicular group(p<0.05). Different types of bone cement leakage were observed in both groups. The leakage rate was higher in the bipedicular group than in the unipedicular group. Patients in the bipedicular group showed greater improvement in bone cement distribution compared to that in patients in the unipedicular group (p<0.05). Conclusions Despite the relatively worse cement distribution, unipedicular approach PKP is a safe and minimally invasive surgical method that has the advantages of short operation time, less blood loss and radiation exposure compared to bipedicular approach PKP for OVCFs.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference26 articles.

1. Anabolic bone therapies in 2014: New bone-forming treatments for osteoporosis;Papapoulos SE;Nature reviews Endocrinology,2015

2. Osteoporosis therapies in 2014;Litwic A;Panminerva medica,2014

3. A nation-wide, outpatient-based survey on the pain, disability, and satisfaction of patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures;Kim KW;Asian spine journal,2013

4. [Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty];Galibert P;Neuro-Chirurgie,1987

5. Comparing pain reduction following vertebroplasty and conservative treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials;Liu J;Pain physician,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3