What comes together wires together – Gender Differences in Sexual Function and Satisfaction depending on when People believe Sexual Intercourse ends and Orgasm Latency in a Chilean Sample

Author:

Quintana Gonzalo R.1ORCID,Santibáñez-Palma Francisco1,Escudero-Pastén Javier1,Consortium CSSS Research1,Barrientos Jaime2

Affiliation:

1. Universidad de Tarapacá

2. Universidad Alberto Hurtado

Abstract

Abstract

Sexual intercourse (SI) is a prevalent sexual behavior with significant implications for sexual health, function, and satisfaction. While extensive research has focused on the duration of SI, particularly intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT), the nuances of when SI ends remain underexplored. This study aimed to elucidate how different interpretations of SI ending cues (SEC) and orgasm latency (OL) time influence sexual function (SF) and sexual satisfaction (SS) among Chilean adults. A cross-sectional design was employed with sexually active men (n = 650; Mage = 33.7, SD = 12.0) and women (n = 1905; Mage = 32.1, SD = 10.0). SF was assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for women. Participants indicated their preferred SEC from four options: “it's uncertain”, “when my partner reaches an orgasm”, “when I reach an orgasm”, or “when both reach an orgasm, even if at different times”. Results indicated a typical OL of 10–20 minutes, with a preference for mutual orgasm as the SEC. Gender differences emerged, with women more likely to focus on their partner's orgasm and men on their own. Variations in SF and SS were more pronounced among women, particularly in dimensions of desire, arousal, and satisfaction. OL also influenced women's orgasm function and men's erectile and orgasm functions. This study provides insights into the gender-specific impacts of SEC and OL on SF and SS, highlighting the importance of considering these factors in sexual health research and interventions.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3