What is the Optimal Number of Embryos to Transfer for Poseidon Group 1 and Group 2? A retrospective study

Author:

Liu Rang1,Zhang Qiuju1,Geng Lan1,He Huiqing1,Xu Chang2,Feng Jiali1,Song Miaoling1,Cao Yanpei1,Wang Tianren3,Xia Xi1

Affiliation:

1. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518036

2. Intelligence Hospital Research Academy, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518036

3. Center for Reproductive Medicine, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518000

Abstract

Abstract Background: The 2016 Patient-Oriented Strategy Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number (POSEIDON) criteria redefined the poor responders as low prognosis patients. The embryo transfer strategy for Poseidon patients remained to be addressed. This study aimed to investigate the optimized number of embryos to transfer for unexpected low-prognosis patients (Poseidon Group 1 and Group 2) with blastocyst transfer in their first frozen cycle. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 2970 patients who underwent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) between January 2018 and December 2021. Patients from Poseidon Group 1 (N=219) and Group 2 (N=135) who underwent blastocyst transfer in their first FET cycles were included and divided into the elective single embryo transfer (eSET) group and the double embryo transfer (DET) group. Results: For Poseidon Group 1, the live birth rateper embryo transfer of the DET group was slightly higher than the eSET group (52.17% vs 46.15%, OR 0.786, 95% CI 0.462-1.337, P = 0.374; adjusted OR (aOR) 0.622, 95% CI 0.340-1.140, P = 0.124), while a significant increase of 20.00% in the multiple birth rate was shown. For Group 2, higher live birth rates were observed in the DET group compared to the eSET group (38.46% vs 20.48%, OR 0.412, 95% CI 0.190-0.892, P = 0.024; aOR 0.358, 95% CI 0.155-0.828, P = 0.016). The difference in the multiple birth rate was 20.00% without statistical significance. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that age (OR 0.759, 95% CI .624-0.922, P = 0.006 and OR 0.751, 95% CI 0.605-0.932, P = 0.009) and the number of transferred embryos (OR 0.412, 95% CI 0.190-0.892, P = 0.024 and OR 0.367, 95% CI 0.161-0.840, P= 0.018) were significant variables for the live birth rate in Poseidon Group 2. Conclusions: The findings in the present study showed that eSET was preferred in the first frozen cycle for Poseidon Group 1 to avoid unnecessary risks. Double embryo transfer strategy could be considered to improve the success rate for Poseidon Group 2 with caution. Further stratification by age is needed for a more scientific discussion about the embryo transfer strategy for Poseidon patients.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3