Affiliation:
1. International Health Policy Program
2. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
3. University of Freiburg
4. Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health (D24H), University of Hong Kong
Abstract
AbstractBackground The Dekthai Kamsai programme, a complex school nutrition intervention implemented in Thailand, demonstrated favourable outcomes in reducing the risk of developing obesity and stunting. This article aims to describe the intervention, contextual factors, and their interactions influencing the outcomes. Methods We conducted a process evaluation using data obtained from 14 focus group discussions held with 69 school staff from 14 intervention schools and 4 control schools, from January to February 2022, and a document analysis. Results Perceived strengths of the programme included: 1) its multi-component design targeting both diet and physical activity using food and physical activity guidelines for children, close monitoring of students’ anthropometric outcomes for ongoing nutrition improvements, and complementary components that synergistically enhanced and sustained its outcomes; and 2) a multi-sectoral support system to build schools’ capacity and facilitate programme implementation. Perceived limitations were no adequate effort to address wasting and suboptimal fidelity. Regarding contextual factors, child nutrition and well-being were not a priority for the education sector, which resulted in limited resources and the willingness of school staff to adopt and implement the programme. Schools in higher socio-economic urban neighbourhoods tended to receive greater external support and benefit more from better infrastructure of urban areas. The programme’s impact in urban schools tended to be offset by urban obesogenic environments. School staff having interest in children’s well-being tended to adopt and implement the programme intensively. A healthier food culture tended to enhance the intervention success. Conclusions These findings highlight the importance of 1) providing multifaceted interventions; 2) making child nutrition and well-being a priority of the education sector; and 3) improving school contexts notably policy, leadership, capacity, social capital, social and physical environments.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference45 articles.
1. 1. Pawson, R, Tilly N. Realistic Evaluation. London: SAGE Publications; 1997.
2. 2. Liu Z, Xu HM, Wen LM, Peng YZ, Lin LZ, Zhou S, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the overall effects of school-based obesity prevention interventions and effect differences by intervention components. Vol. 16, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. BioMed Central Ltd.; 2019.
3. 3. Pongutta S, Ajetunmobi O, Davey C, Ferguson E, Lin L. Impacts of School Nutrition Interventions on the Nutritional Status of School-Aged Children in Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2022, Vol 14, Page 589. 2022 Jan 28;14(3):589.
4. 4. Feng L, Wei D, Lin S, Maddison R, Mhurchu CN, Jiang Y, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of school-based obesity interventions in mainland China. PloS one. 2017 Sep 1;12(9).
5. 5. Abbafati C, Machado DB, Cislaghi B, Salman OM, Karanikolos M, McKee M, et al. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. 2020;396(10258).