Affiliation:
1. West China Hospital of Sichuan University
2. Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Chengdu
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
This study in order to provide better evidence for the selection of fixation methods for measurement catheters during clinical UDS .
Methods
We selected patients who had undergone urodynamic examinations at the XXX between April and June 2023. These patients were chosen based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria established for the study. We observed the effectiveness of three different fixation methods: 1.Waterproof Tape Fixation(group1) 2. Patient-Manual Fixation(group2) 3. Silk Thread Fixation(group3).
Results
There were 28 patients enrolled in each group, and the mean ages were: 62.82 ± 15.59, 66.14 ± 8.63, 63 ± 16.78 years, respectively. MCC, BC, Qmax, Pdet.Qmax, BCI and BOO in 3 different catheter fixation methods had no statistical difference (P > 0.05). The total incidence of catheter displacement in group1, group2 and group3 was 35.71%, 0, 14.29%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the Comfort-B scale of Group 1 and Group 2, Group 2 and Group 3 (p < 0.000). Regarding the visual analogue scores, there was a statistically significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2, Group 2 and Group 3 (p < 0.000).
Conclusions
We conducted a preliminary verification and found that three different methods of catheter fixation during UDS had no significant impact on the test results. However, it is important to note that patient-manual fixation, as well as the other two fixation methods, may result in decreased comfort and increased pain for patients during the UDS process.
Clinical trial registration: ChiCTR2300068280. 2023-5-15
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference21 articles.
1. Good urodynamic practices: Uroflow- metry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies;Schafer W;Neurourol Urodyn,2002
2. International Continence Society Good Urodynamic Practices and Terms 2016: urody- namics, uroflowmetry, cystometry, and pressure-flow study;Rosier P;Neurourol Urodyn,2017
3. International Continence Society guidelines on urodynamic equipment performance;Gammie A;Neurourol Urodyn,2014
4. Quality of urodynamics: a national cross-sectional study in China;Zeng X;Chin Med J,2023
5. Evaluation of the effectiveness of four alternative approaches for the classical cough test during a urodynamic study in the context of the COVID-19 global pandemic;Zeng X;BMC Urol,2023