Could the Trustworthiness in RAndomized Controlled Trials (TRACT) checklist be trusted?

Author:

Alinany Hesham G1,AbdelMonem Tamer M2,Sobh Ahmed M3,Galal Ahmed F4,Elnomrosy 5,Rezk Ahmed Y6

Affiliation:

1. Cairo university

2. University Hospital Southampton, UK

3. Assiut University Egypt

4. Alexandria University, Egypt

5. Frimley Park NHS Foundation Trust Hospital, UK

6. Benha University

Abstract

Abstract Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard study design in clinical effectiveness research, albeit some RCTs have been found to be fraudulent post-publication. The Trustworthiness in RAndomized Controlled Trials (TRACT) checklist examines RCT integrity through an assessment covering seven domains. While the authors claim that it can identify problematic trials, it has never been validated. A critical appraisal of the checklist highlights major failures in terms of health measurement methodology, including the arbitrary nature of items chosen. We applied the checklist to 16 RCTs coauthored by the checklist developer, and identified potential violations related to retrospective registration, ethical implications, authorship, methodology, implausible timeframes, zero participants to follow-up, implausible baseline characteristics, and excessive inter-group within trial as well as inter-trial similarities. In addition, we identified inconsistencies between the trials’ registration and data in the final published manuscripts. If we uncritically assume that the checklist is valid, then a formal institutional investigation into the trial portfolio its developer is warranted; especially targeting these 16 trials objectively shown to be problematic. The checklist should be considered as neither investigative nor conclusive of potential problems with RCTs until it is further refined and validated.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference38 articles.

1. Mol B, Lai S, Rahim A, Bordewijk E, Wang R, Eekelen Rv, Gurrin L, Thornton J, Wely Mv, Li W: A checklist to assess Trustworthiness in RAndomised Controlled Trials (TRACT checklist). In.: Research Square; 2023.

2. Assessing the Gold Standard–Lessons from the History of RCTs;Bothwell LE;The New England journal of medicine,2016

3. The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine;Burns PB;Plastic and reconstructive surgery,2011

4. Why most published research findings are false;Ioannidis JP;PLoS medicine,2005

5. False individual patient data and zombie randomised controlled trials submitted to Anaesthesia;Carlisle JB;Anaesthesia,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3