Feasibility of Local Anaesthesia in Various Upper Abdominal Surgical Procedures; A Tertiary Care Hospital Study

Author:

Gulzar Muhammad AzeemORCID,Raza Muhammad,Parveen Salma,Shahid Anum,Naseem SanaORCID

Abstract

Background: This study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of local anesthesia (LA) instead of general anesthesia (GA) in upper gastrointestinal abdominal procedures including open gastrostomy, gastrojejunostomy, gastroduodenal disjunction, jejunostomy and traction esophageal stenting. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted at Thoracic surgery department, Nishtar Hospital Multan, Pakistan from September,1st-December,31st,2020. Out of 147 patients 80 and 67 patients were operated under LA and GA respectively. Age, BMI, gender, procedure performed, etiology, mean time, stay in recovery, PONV, postoperative pain at 4, 8, 12 hours, postoperative sedation and discomfort, within 3-and 7-days postoperative mortality were documented and compared between the two groups. Results: Mean age of the patients in group LA was significantly higher as compared to group GA(p<0.001). Procedure time was 30.06±12.01minutes and 34.42±11.76minutes (p=0.029), mean duration of stay in recovery was 2.31±5.68minutes and 18.80±6.40minutes(p<0.001) in group LA and GA, respectively(p=0.029). Postoperative discomfort was also higher in group GA as compared to group LA(p=0.001). The incidence of PONV was 12.5% and 35.8% in group LA and GA, respectively(p=0.001). Complaint of postoperative pain was 16.2% and 37.3% at 4 hours(p=0.004); 18.8% and 35.8% at 8 hours(p=0.020); and 21.2% and 26.9% at 12 hours(p=0.426) in group LA and GA, respectively. Conclusion: For performing various upper abdominal procedures, LA is safe for the patients who are medically unfit for GA. Moreover, LA is associated with lesser adverse effects as compared to GA. Patient is more comfortable and there is better pain relief in early postoperative period.

Publisher

Frontier Science Associates

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3