PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETER (PICC) IN NEONATAL INTENSIVE THERAPY NEWBORNS: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS

Author:

de Jesus Moraes Ana Paula,Rossetto Kron-Rodrigues Meline,De Oliveira Freitas Noélle,Andréa Molina Lima Silvana

Abstract

Objective: to identify and evaluate the effectiveness of the use of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) compared to the use of other intravenous catheters in newborns hospitalized in neonatal intensive care units. Method: This is a bibliographic study, a systematic review carried out according to the Cochrane methodology and regulations of the PRISMA check list. The Databases PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS) were consulted until March 2021. Reviewers independently tracked eligible randomizedclinical trials (CRTs); extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias through the Cochraneapproach. Associations were reported as relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI).Heterogeneity was tested with the Cochrane χ2 test, and the degree of heterogeneity quantified with statistics I2 and its 95% CI. The Review Manager (RevMan) software was used for meta-analysis (version 5.3). The quality of the evidence was generated according to the Evaluation of theClassification of Recommendations, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Results: There was nostatistically difference for the occurrence of sepsis, mortality, catheter-related complications(infections) and catheter length of stay between groups. For the number of venopunctures required for catheter insertion, the findings indicate that for PICC there are lower numbers (RR -6.17, 95% CI:-7.75 to -4.59) and that there is low heterogeneity (I2=32%) among the studies. However, these results should be interpreted with caution, since the evaluation of the quality of the evidence was low. Conclusion: No moderate or high-quality evidence was found in ECRs that proves that there is differentiated effectiveness between PICC compared to the use of other intravenous catheters in newborns hospitalized in neonatal intensive care units, thus evidencing the need for further studiesin the area.

Publisher

RECIMA21 - Revista Cientifica Multidisciplinar

Reference58 articles.

1. Montes SF, Teixeira JBA, Barbosa MH, Barichello E. Ocorrência de complicações ao uso de

2. Cateter Venoso Central de Inserção Periférica (PICC) em recém-nascidos.Enfermaria Global. 2011;

3. -19.

4. Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria. Transporte do recém-nascido de alto risco: diretrizes da

5. Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria- São Paulo: Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria, 2015.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3