Numerical Study of Road Embankment Type Action on Shear Stress Around Skewed Bridge Abutment
-
Published:2022-12-23
Issue:4
Volume:17
Page:95-119
-
ISSN:1822-427X
-
Container-title:The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:BJRBE
Author:
Asadi Mahdi1ORCID, Kilanehei Fouad1ORCID, Mahjoob Amir2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Civil Engineering, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran 2. Transportation Research Institute, Road, Housing and Urban Development Research Center, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
This paper investigates the effect of different geometries of approach embankments and guides banks on the flow pattern and bed shear stress values in the skewed bridges in the compound channel using three-dimensional numerical modelling. First, the numerical model was evaluated based on the results of existing laboratory studies. After ensuring its proper performance, the elliptical guide bank and the three types of abutments: vertical-wall, spill-through, and wing-wall, at different skew angles are examined. Investigation of the values of maximum velocity and bed shear stress at the flow-conducting embankment and the flow-splitting embankment showed that in the flow-conducting embankment, the best performance is assigned to the elliptical guide bank. In contrast, the performance of various abutments is different for the flow-splitting embankment depending on the skew angle of the bridge. Then, different patterns based on streamlines for the geometry plan of the guide bank were proposed and studied. The results show that the most suitable pattern for the guide bank reduces the maximum flow velocity by up to 15% and reduces the maximum bed shear stress by up to 80% around the flow-splitting embankments.
Publisher
Riga Technical University
Subject
Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference19 articles.
1. Ahmad, M., Ghani, U., Anjum, N., Ahmed Pasha, G., Kaleem Ullah, M., & Ahmed, A. (2020). Investigating the flow hydrodynamics in a compound channel with layered vegetated floodplains. Civil Engineering Journal, 6(5), 860–876. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2020-03091513 2. Al-Khatib, I. A., & Dmadi, N. M. (1996). Boundary Shear Stress in Rectangular Compound Channels. Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences, 23(1), 9–18. 3. Biglari, B., & Sturm, T. W. (1998). Numerical Modeling of Flow around Bridge Abutments in Compound Channel. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 124(2), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1998)124:2(156) 4. Erduran, K. S., Seckin, G., Kocaman, S., & Atabay, S. (2012). 3D Numerical Modelling of Flow Around Skewed Bridge Crossing. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 6(3), 475–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2012.11015436 5. Fernandes, J. N., Leal, J. B. and Cardoso, A. H. (2012). Flow structure in a compound channel with smooth and rough floodplains. European Water, 38(1), 3–12.
|
|