Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2014; 27(05): 366-371
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-14-03-0050
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Morphologic and morphometric features of the calcaneal insertions of the superficial digital flexor tendon in the horse

W. H. J. Barker
1   Newmarket Equine Hospital, Cambridge Road, Newmarket, Suffolk, UK
,
I. M. Wright
1   Newmarket Equine Hospital, Cambridge Road, Newmarket, Suffolk, UK
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 29 March 2014

Accepted: 11 July 2014

Publication Date:
22 December 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Introduction: Accurate description of the calcaneal insertions of the superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT) is lacking and inconsistent. The aim of this study was to undertake morphologic and morphometic evaluations of these structures to assist in elucidating their functional and pathogenic roles in displacement of the SDFT from the calcaneal tuber.

Method: Dissections were performed on 10 normal cadaveric hindlimbs. The anatomy was photographed to allow measurements at repeatable locations and differences in SDFT dimensions at the various locations were compared using a paired student t-test.

Results: This study demonstrated that the calcaneal insertions of the SDFT are independent from the overlying tarsal insertions of the biceps femoris and semitendinosus, which blend into the plantar surface of the fibrocartilaginous cap (FCC) of the SDFT before inserting dorsal to the insertion of the SDFT on the calcaneal tuber. The lateral insertion of the SDFT is larger in cross-sectional area (median: 219 mm2) at its origin from the FCC than its medial counterpart (median: 159 mm2, p = 0.004) and has a more complex fibre alignment. The lateral site of attachment of the SDFT on the calcaneal tuber is dorsolateral to the insertion of the gastrocnemius tendon and is larger (median: 525 mm2) than the medial insertion (median: 428 mm2, p = 0.036), which inserts distal to the insertion of the gastrocnemius tendon.

Conclusion: The features identified in this study suggest that the calcaneal insertions of the SDFT are complex and their morphological and morphometric differences are likely to contribute to clinical lesions identified at this site.

Keywords

Superficial digital flexor tendon - calcaneal insertions - biceps femoris - semitendinosus

 

  • References

  • 1 Sisson S. Equine Myology. In Grossman JD. editor The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals. 4th ed. Philadelphia & London: W. B. Saunders Co; 1953: 256-344.
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Dyce KM, Sack WO, Wensing CJG. The Hindlimb of the Horse. In: Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy. 3rd ed. Philadelphia & London: W.B. Saunders; 1996: 606-625.
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Scott EA, Breuhaus B, Gertsen KE. Surgical repair of dislocated superficial digital flexor tendon in a horse. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1982; 181: 171-172.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Meagher DM, Aldrete AV. Lateral luxation of the superficial digital flexor tendon from the calcaneal tuber in 2 horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989; 195: 495-498.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Post EM, Singer ER, Clegg PD. An anatomic study of the calcaneal bursae in the horse. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 3-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Stashak TS. Lameness. In Stashak TS. editor Adams' Lameness in Horses. 5th ed. Philadelphia & London: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002: 645-1079.
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Latimer FG. Tarsus and stifle. In Hinchcliff KW, Kaneps AJ, Geor RJ. editors Equine Sports Medicine and Surgery. Edinburgh: Saunders; 2004: 368-411.
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Ross MW. The Metatarsal Region. In Ross MW, Dyson SJ. editors Diagnosis and Management of Lameness in the Horse. 2nd ed. Missouri: Elsevier Saunders; 2011: 499-508.
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Wright IM, Minshall GJ. Injuries of the calcaneal insertions of the superficial digital flexor tendon in 19 horses. Equine Vet J 2012; 44: 136-142.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Dik KJ, Leitch M. Soft tissue injuries of the tarsus. Vet Clin North Am Eq Pract 1995; 11: 235-247.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature methods 2012; 9: 671-675.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Girish V, Vijayalakshmi A. Affordable image analysis using NIH Image/Image J. Indian J Cancer 2004; 41: 47.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Benjamin M. Tendons are dynamic structures that respond to changes in exercise levels. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2002; 12: 63-64.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Benjamin M, Hillen B. Mechanical influences on cells, tissues and organs - ‘Mechanical Morphogenesis'. Eur J Morphol 2003; 41: 3-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Benjamin M, Toumi H, Ralphs JR. et al Where tendons and ligaments meet bone: attachment sites (‘entheses') in relation to exercise and/or mechanical load. J Anat 2006; 208: 471-490.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Sisson S. Equine Arthrology. In Grossman JD. editor The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals. 4th ed. Philadelphia & London: W. B. Saunders Co; 1953: 213-245.
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Reiners S, Jann H, Gillis E. Repair of medial luxation of the superficial digital flexor tendon in the pelvic limb of a filly. Equine Pract 2000; 22: 18-21.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar