Does changes in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty practice pattern influence reasons for revision?

Author:

Mikkelsen Mette1ORCID,Rasmussen Lasse E.2,Price Andrew3,Pedersen Alma B.4ORCID,Gromov Kirill1ORCID,Troelsen Anders1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinical Orthopaedic Research Hvidovre (CORH), Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark

2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark

3. Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

4. Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark

Abstract

AimsThe aim of this study was to describe the pattern of revision indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and any change to this pattern for UKA patients over the last 20 years, and to investigate potential associations to changes in surgical practice over time.MethodsAll primary knee arthroplasty surgeries performed due to primary osteoarthritis and their revisions reported to the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register from 1997 to 2017 were included. Complex surgeries were excluded. The data was linked to the National Patient Register and the Civil Registration System for comorbidity, mortality, and emigration status. TKAs were propensity score matched 4:1 to UKAs. Revision risks were compared using competing risk Cox proportional hazard regression with a shared γ frailty component.ResultsAseptic loosening (loosening) was the most common revision indication for both UKA (26.7%) and TKA (29.5%). Pain and disease progression accounted for 54.6% of the remaining UKA revisions. Infections and instability accounted for 56.1% of the remaining TKA revision. The incidence of revision due to loosening or pain decreased over the last decade, being the second and third least common indications in 2017. There was a decrease associated with fixation method for pain (hazard ratio (HR) 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17 to 0.94) and loosening (HR 0.29; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.81) for cementless compared to cemented, and units UKA usage for pain (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.91), and loosening (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.70) for high usage.ConclusionThe overall revision patterns for UKA and TKA for the last 20 years are comparable to previous published patterns. We found large changes to UKA revision patterns in the last decade, and with the current surgical practice, revision due to pain or loosening are significantly less likely.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(12):923–931.

Publisher

British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery

Subject

Surgery,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Reference38 articles.

1. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty in the UK National Health Service: an analysis of candidacy, outcome and cost efficacy;Willis-Owen;Knee,2009

2. Evidence-based indications for mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in a consecutive cohort of thousand knees;Hamilton;J Arthroplasty,2017

3. Ben-Shlomo Y , Blom A , Boulton C , et al. The National Joint Registry 17th Annual Report 2020 . London, UK . 2020 . https://reports.njrcentre.org.uk/2020 ( date last accessed 27 November 2023 ).

4. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry . Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty - Annual Report 2018 , 2018 : 1 – 444 .

5. Completeness and capture rate of publicly funded arthroplasty procedures in the New Zealand Joint Registry;Rahardja;Yearly Report Registry Management Committee Annual Report Editorial Committee,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3