Navigating the Path to Construction 4.0: Policies, Challenges, and Strategies in Malaysian Construction Industry
-
Published:2023-12-30
Issue:3
Volume:8
Page:89-103
-
ISSN:0128-259X
-
Container-title:GATR Journal of Business and Economics Review
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J. Bus. Econ. Review
Author:
CHAN Szewen1, CHAI Changsaar2, LIM Chiuyiong BIBIANA3, EKAMBARAM Palaneeswaran4, GHANI Mohd Khairolden Bin5, LEE Chiakuang6
Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Engineering, Computing and Science, Swinburne University of Technology Sarawak Campus, Kuching, Malaysia 2. School of Architecture, Building and Design, Faculty of Innovation and Technology, Taylor's University, Selangor, Malaysia 3. Faculty of Business, Design and Arts, Swinburne University of Technology Sarawak Campus, Kuching, Malaysia 4. School of Engineering, Centre of Sustainable Infrastructure and Digital Construction, Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia 5. Construction Industry Consultancy (BPIP), Construction Research Institute of Malaysia (CREAM), Malaysia 6. Faculty of Industrial Management, University Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, Malaysia
Abstract
Objective – This research introduces the Kaleidoscope Model, which offers a roadmap for policymakers to perform effective changes with the moderating effect of the challenges faced.
Methodology – The study employs document analysis and semi-structured interviews for qualitative data through content analysis.
Findings – Results highlight that Policy Adoption and Policy Implementation notably influence the evaluation of the effectiveness of the Construction 4.0 policy. It is found that the moderating effect (challenges) does not influence the adoption of the Construction 4.0 policy in the Malaysian construction industry.
Novelty – The novelty of this research lies in its provision of a framework, namely the Kaleidoscope Model, designed to facilitate the assessment of the effectiveness of implementing the Construction 4.0 policy in Malaysia. This framework aids policymakers and construction stakeholders in better understanding how to embrace new technologies, ultimately contributing to the realization of policy goals and enhancing effectiveness and efficiency in the construction industry.
Type of Paper: Empirical
JEL Classification: L74, L78.
Keywords: Construction 4.0 Policy; Policy Change; Kaleidoscope Model; Policy Implementation Challenges; Malaysian Construction Industry
Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Chan, S; Chai, C; Lim, C.B; Ekambaram, P.; Ghani, M.K.B; LEE, C. (2023). Navigating the Path to Construction 4.0: Policies, Challenges, and Strategies in Malaysian Construction Industry, J. Bus. Econ. Review, 8(3), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.35609/jber.2023.8.3(3)
Publisher
Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise
Reference38 articles.
1. Abdullahi, M., & Othman, N. (2020). Bridging the gap between policy intent and implementation. Journal of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, 6(1), 24–33. 2. Adam, C., Hurka, S., Knill, C., Peters, B. G., & Steinebach, Y. (2019). Introducing vertical policy coordination to comparative policy analysis: The missing link between policy production and implementation. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 21(5), 499–517. 3. Axsen, J., & Wolinetz, M. (2021). Taxes, tolls and ZEV zones for climate: Synthesizing insights on effectiveness, efficiency, equity, acceptability and implementation. Energy Policy, 156, 112457. 4. Castellani, B., Bartington, S., Wistow, J., Heckels, N., Ellison, A., Van Tongeren, M., Arnold, S. R., Barbrook-Johnson, P., Bicket, M., & Pope, F. D. (2022). Mitigating the impact of air pollution on dementia and brain health: Setting the policy agenda. Environmental Research, 114362. 5. Construction Industry Development Board. (2019). Construction Industry Transformation Programme (2016-2020). Midterm Review for Enhancement. CIDB. 2019.
|
|