Blood sampling from the retro-orbital plexus, the saphenous vein and the tail vein in rats: comparative effects on selected behavioural and blood variables

Author:

van Herck H.1,Baumans V.2,Brandt C. J. W. M.,Boere H. A. G.,Hesp A. P. M.,van Lith H. A.,Schurink M.,Beynen A. C.

Affiliation:

1. Central Laboratory Animal Institute (GDL), Utrecht University, The Netherlands

2. Department Of Laboratory Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands

Abstract

We compared the behaviours of rats, and measured various blood parameters, after three blood sampling techniques: orbital puncture while they were under diethyl-ether anaesthesia, blood collection by tail vein puncture under O2-N 2O-halothane anaesthesia and puncture of the saphenous vein without anaesthesia. Twelve rats were subjected to the three treatments according to a Latin square design. After each treatment, the behaviour of the rats was automatically monitored using the so-called LABORASTM method, which discriminates between grooming, locomotion and inactivity in rats. Based on excitation scores and urine production, it was found that induction of diethyl-ether anaesthesia combined with orbital puncture caused more distress than did the other two blood sampling techniques. The three techniques had no differential effects on the behaviours of grooming, locomotion and inactivity. Collecting 0.5 ml of blood by orbital puncture was ± 7 times faster than doing so by saphenous vein puncture and ± 15 times faster than collecting blood by tail vein puncture while the rats were under O2-N 2O-halothane anaesthesia. The levels of some haematological and plasma variables differed significantly between the three blood collection techniques. These observations may help to select the most appropriate technique of blood sampling with respect to anticipated discomfort in the animals.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3