Affiliation:
1. O.P. Jindal Global University, India
Abstract
This chapter deals with the concept of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in India and Canada. It scrutinizes the effectiveness of EIA regulatory frameworks in both the countries on the touchstone of extent of public participation, engagement with indigenous communities, and the integration of healthcare aspects. The analysis reveals a nuanced landscape wherein Canada serves as a model for comprehensive and well-structured EIA practices, whereas India grapples with challenges in implementation and enforcement. Canada excels in inclusivity by actively involving the public and indigenous communities in decision-making processes. In contrast, India faces hurdles in achieving meaningful public participation particularly in marginalized communities. The study emphasizes the need for contextualization in EIA frameworks and raises questions about improving public engagement and healthcare integration globally.
Reference31 articles.
1. Angevine, G., & Green, K. P. (2016). Obstacles Faced by Major Pipeline Projects. In The Costs of Pipeline Obstructionism (pp. 22–27). Fraser Institute. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep33286.9
2. Integrating Human Health into Environmental Impact Assessment: An Unrealized Opportunity for Environmental Health and Justice
3. BirleyM. (2011). Health Impact Assessment: Principles and Practice (1st ed.). Earthscan.
4. Centre for Social Justice v. Union of India, AIR 2001 Guj 71
5. Diduck, A., Pratap, D., Sinclair, J., & Deanne, S. (2013). Perceptions of impacts, public participation, and learning in the planning, assessment and mitigation of two hydroelectric projects in Uttarakhand, India. ScienceDirect, 33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264837713000197