Factors Affecting the Use of Speech Testing in Adult Audiology

Author:

Parmar Bhavisha J.12ORCID,Rajasingam Saima L.3ORCID,Bizley Jennifer K.1ORCID,Vickers Deborah A.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. UCL Ear Institute, University College London, United Kingdom

2. Sound Lab, Cambridge Hearing Group, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

3. Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate hearing health care professionals' (HHPs) speech testing practices in routine adult audiology services and better understand the facilitators and barriers to speech testing provision. Design: A cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted. Study Sample: A sample ( N = 306) of HHPs from the public (64%) and private (36%) sectors in the United Kingdom completed the survey. Results: In the United Kingdom, speech testing practice varied significantly between health sectors. Speech testing was carried out during the audiology assessment by 73.4% of private sector HHPs and 20.4% of those from the public sector. During the hearing aid intervention stage, speech testing was carried out by 56.5% and 26.5% of HHPs from the private and public sectors, respectively. Recognized benefits of speech testing included (a) providing patients with relatable assessment information, (b) guiding hearing aid fitting, and (c) supporting a diagnostic test battery. A lack of clinical time was a key barrier to uptake. Conclusions: Use of speech testing varies in adult audiology. Results from this study found that the percentage of U.K. HHPs making use of speech tests was low compared to that of other countries. HHPs recognized different benefits of speech testing in audiology practice, but the barriers limiting uptake were often driven by factors derived from decision makers rather than clinical rationale. Privately funded HHPs used speech tests more frequently than those working in the public sector where time and resources are under greater pressure and governed by guidance that does not include a recommendation for speech testing. Therefore, the inclusion of speech testing in national clinical guidelines could increase the consistency of use and facilitate the comparison of practice trends across centers. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.20044457

Publisher

American Speech Language Hearing Association

Subject

Speech and Hearing

Reference81 articles.

1. An introduction to MarkeTrak IX: A new baseline for the hearing aid market;Abrahms H.;Hearing Review,2015

2. International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology (ICRA) recommendations for the construction of multilingual speech tests

3. Audiology and speech-language pathology practice in Saudi Arabia;Alanazi A. A.;International Journal of Health Sciences,2017

4. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2014). Central auditory processing disorder. http://www.asha.org/Practice-Portal/Clinical-Topics/Central-Auditory-Processing-Disorder/

5. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2019). Audiology survey report: Private practice. https://www.asha.org/siteassets/surveys/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3