EQUATOR Network Mapping Review for Dysphagia Research

Author:

Steele Catriona M.123ORCID,Burdick Ryan J.4ORCID,Dallal-York Justine5ORCID,Shapira-Galitz Yael67ORCID,Abrams Sophia Werden8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Swallowing Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

2. Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada

3. Canada Research Chair in Swallowing and Food Oral Processing, Canada Research Chairs Secretariat, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

4. Swallowing and Salivary Bioscience Lab, Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin–Madison

5. Laboratory for the Study of Upper Airway Dysfunction, Department of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY

6. Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel

7. Hadassah School of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel

8. Aging Swallow Research Laboratory, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

Purpose: The EQUATOR Network is an international initiative aimed at improving published health research through use of reporting guidelines. We conducted a review to determine the extent to which EQUATOR Network guidelines contain recommendations relevant for dysphagia research in human subjects. Method: We downloaded all 542 EQUATOR Network guidelines on November 8, 2022. Each guideline was reviewed by two independent raters and judged for relevance to dysphagia and related fields (e.g., otolaryngology, gastroenterology). Dysphagia-relevant guidelines pertaining to quantitative human subjects research were further inspected to identify reporting guidance regarding (a) general research elements (e.g., data collection, statistical methods), (b) participant characteristics (e.g., demographics, accrual, randomization), (c) screening and clinical/noninstrumental assessments, (d) videofluoroscopic examinations, (e) flexible endoscopic examinations, (f) other instrumentation in swallowing research, (g) dysphagia treatment, (h) patient-/care provider–reported outcome measures, and (i) any other narrowly specified focus relevant for research on swallowing. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Results: Of 542 guidelines, 156 addressed quantitative research in human subjects relevant to dysphagia. Of these, 104 addressed general research elements and 108 addressed participant characteristics. Only 14 guidelines partially addressed the other topics of interest, and none addressed elements relevant to reporting videofluoroscopic or endoscopic assessments of swallowing. Conclusions: We were unable to find guidelines with specific relevance to reporting key methods in dysphagia research. This lack of guidance illustrates a gap that hinders the critical appraisal of research quality in the field of dysphagia. Our review highlights the need to develop dysphagia-specific tools for critical appraisal and guidance regarding adequate research reporting. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25014017

Publisher

American Speech Language Hearing Association

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3