Abstract
Social acceleration has been a catalyst for rapid changes concerning the mediascapes of European societies. Democratic societies need deliberation, but what kinds of journalism and communication cultures are supported by different stakeholders and structural possibilities? The aim of this article is to conceptualise and analyse the risks and opportunities concerning the monitoring capabilities in key domains of the media field. This includes the performance and normative regulation of news media (journalism) as well as media usage patterns and competencies of different actors, all of which influence the quality of deliberative communication across cultures. The monitoring potential is related to various stakeholders who gather data and information on media and media usage, transform the information into knowledge, and use this knowledge to create evidence-based media policy. What interests and values are served by which stakeholders and how does this actual monitoring serve the media policy in different European countries? What is the role and resources of media researchers? These questions are answered with the help of an extensive literature review and a synoptic analysis of the monitoring capabilities of 14 European countries, based on original case studies. The article will, thus, broaden the conceptual understanding of risks and opportunities for deliberative communication in democratic societies—and at the same time offer an initial inventory of typical problems and best practices for monitoring deliberative communication across Europe.
Reference66 articles.
1. Ackoff, R. L. (1989). From data to wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 16(1), 3–9.
2. Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge University Press.
3. Archer, M. S. (2017). Morphogenesis: Realism’s explanatory framework. In T. Brock, M. Carrigan, & G. Scambler (Eds.), Structure, culture and agency: Selected papers of Margaret Archer (pp. 1–35). Routledge.
4. Avădani, I. (2022). Romania: Risks and opportunities related to media and journalism studies (2000–2020). Mediadelcom. https://www.mediadelcom.eu/publications/d21-case-study-1/rou
5. Bächtiger, A., Dryzek, J. S., Jane, M., & Warren, M. E. (Eds.). (2018). The Oxford handbook of deliberative democracy. Oxford University Press.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献