Numerical investigation of the effect of topology optimisation methods parameters in the topology quality, the strength, and the computational cost
Author:
Ait Ouchaoui A.1, Nassraoui M.2ORCID, Radi B.3
Affiliation:
1. National High School of Electricity and Mechanics, University Hassan II, Casablanca, Morocco; Laboratory of Mechanics, Products, and Industrial Engineering, EST, University Hassan II, Casablanca, Morocco 2. Laboratory of Mechanics, Production, and Industrial Engineering, High School of Technology of Casablanca, University Hassan II of Casablanca, Casablanca, Morocco 3. Laboratory IMII, FST, University Hassan I, Settat, Morocco
Abstract
The literature abounds with many distinct topology optimisation methods, many of which share common parameter configurations. This study demonstrates that alternative parameter configurations may produce better results than common parameters. Additionally, we try to answer two fundamental questions: identifying the most effective topology optimisation method and determining the optimal parameter selection within this optimisation method. In order to respond to these questions, we conducted a comparative and objective analysis of topology optimisation methods.This paper evaluates four prominent topology optimisation methodologies, SIMP, RAMP, BESO, and LSM, based on three essential criteria: structural strength, topology quality, and computational cost. We conducted an in-depth examination of 12,500 topology optimisation results spanning a broad range of critical parameter values. These outcomes were generated using MATLAB codes. In the meantime, we comprehensively compared our findings with the existing literature on this subject.As predicted, our chosen parameters had a substantial effect on the topology quality, structural strength, and computational cost of the topology optimisation outcomes. Across the 12,500 results, many parameter combinations appeared to produce favourable results compared to conventional parameters commonly found in the existing literature.This study focuses exclusively on four specific topology optimisation methods; however, its findings may be extrapolated to apply to other methodologies. Additionally, while it extensively examines the effects of parameters on topology quality, strength, and computational cost, it does not encompass an exploration of these parameters' impacts on other performance criteria.Novel parameter configurations for topology optimisation have been identified, yielding enhanced outcomes in terms of topology quality, structural strength, and computational efficiency.
Publisher
Index Copernicus
Reference44 articles.
1. B. Badiru, V.V Valencia, D. Liu (eds), Additive manufacturing handbook: product development for the defense industry, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2017. 2. J. Zhu, H. Zhou, C. Wang, L. Zhou, S. Yuan, W. Zhang, A review of topology optimization for additive manufacturing: Status and challenges, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 34/1 (2021) 91-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.09.020 3. T. Wohlers, T. Gornet, History of additive manufacturing, Wohlers Report, Wohlers Associates, Fort Collins, 2014. 4. A.C. Taylor, S. Beirne, G. Alici, G.G. Wallace, System and process development for coaxial extrusion in fused deposition modelling, Rapid Prototyping Journal 23/3 (2017) 543-550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-10-2015-0141 5. I. Yadroitsev, I. Yadroitsava, A. du Plessis, E. MacDonald, Fundamentals of Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Metals, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/C2020-0-01200-4
|
|