Abstract
Abstract
In this study, tissue scaffolds mimicking hierarchical morphology are constructed and proposed for bone augmentation. The scaffolds are fabricated using lyophilization, before coating them with collagen (Col). Subsequently, the Col-coated scaffolds undergo a second lyophilization, followed by silk fibroin (SF) coating, and a third lyophilization. Thereafter, the scaffolds are divided into six groups with varying ratios of Col to SF: Col/SF = 7:3, 5:5, 3:7, 10:0, and 0:10, with an SF scaffold serving as the control group. The scaffold morphology is examined using a scanning electron microscope, while molecular and structural formations are characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectrometer and differential scanning calorimeter, respectively. Physical and mechanical properties including swelling and compression are tested. Biological functions are assessed through in vitro osteoblast cell culturing. Biomarkers indicative of bone formation–cell viability and proliferation, alkaline phosphatase activity, and calcium content–are analyzed. Results demonstrate that scaffolds coated with Col and SF exhibit sub-porous formations within the main pore. The molecular formation reveals interactions between the hydrophilic groups of Col and SF. The scaffold structure contains bound water and SF formation gets disrupted by Col. Physical and mechanical properties are influenced by the Col/SF ratio and morphology due to coating. The biological functions of scaffolds with Col and SF coating show enhanced potential for promoting bone tissue formation, particularly the Col/SF (7:3) ratio, which is most suitable for bone augmentation in small defect areas.
Reference68 articles.
1. Reconstruction of maxillofacial bone defects using patient-specific long-lasting titanium implants;Lim;Sci. Rep.,2022
2. Controversies in traditional oral and maxillofacial reconstruction oral maxillofacial;Vorrasi;Surg. Clin. North Am.,2017
3. Bone augmentation techniques for horizontal and vertical alveolar ridge deficiency in oral implantology oral maxillofacial;Tolstunov;Surg. Clin. North Am.,2019
4. Recent advances in biofunctional guided bone regeneration materials for repairing defective alveolar and maxillofacial bone: a review;Wang;Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev.,2022
5. Guided bone regeneration for the reconstruction of alveolar bone defects;Khojasteh;Ann. Maxillofac. Surg.,2017