Analysis and validation of mathematical models of secondary velocities along vertical and transverse directions in wide open-channel turbulent flows

Abstract

Abstract Cellular secondary flows are inevitably present in turbulent flows through ducts, natural or artificial channels, and compound channels. Secondary currents significantly modify the characteristics of turbulent quantities, the pattern of primary flow velocity by causing dip-phenomenon. To understand the detailed mechanism and hidden cause, modelling of secondary flow velocities is crucial. In this study, proper mathematical models of secondary flow velocities along vertical and transverse directions are proposed for steady and uniform turbulent flow through wide open channels with equal smooth and rough bed strips. Starting from the continuity and the Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes equations, governing equation for secondary velocity is derived first and then using appropriate boundary conditions (no-slip boundary conditions at channel bottom and free surface, and maximum vertical velocity in magnitude at the interface of two cellular secondary cells and at mid-depth of the channel. All these conditions are consistent with several experimental observations). A new model of the streamwise Reynolds shear stress is proposed for the entire cross-sectional plane and using it, the analytical solutions are obtained. Proposed models include the effects of viscosity of the fluid and the eddy viscosity model of turbulence. All suggested models are validated with existing experimental data in rectangular open-channel flows, compound open channel flows, and duct flows, and satisfactory results are obtained. Furthermore, models are also compared with existing empirical models from literature to show the effectiveness and superiority of proposed models. Apart from these, the obtained results from this study are used to investigate the effects of vertical and transverse secondary flow velocities on the settling velocity vector in a cross-sectional plane. Effective alternative models for the settling velocity vector are suggested. The model of settling velocity vector is also compared with the existing model. Finally, all results are justified from physical viewpoints.