Relative Performance of Linear Quadratic Regulator and Pole Placement Technique for Active Seismic Control of Structures

Author:

Rather F,Alam M

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents the study conducted on the comparison of the performance of the two popular active control algorithms viz. Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) and Pole Placement technique in terms of their capability to alleviate the response of a structure to an earthquake. To compare the performance of the two control algorithms, a ten story regular shear building frame with three active tendons located in 1st, 4th and 5th Storys and subjected to an El Centro earthquake has been considered. A comparison of the numerical results shows that the reductions of maximum top floor displacement, maximum story drift and base shear obtained using LQR control algorithm are 71.48%, 59.70% and 62.7% while the reductions obtained using Pole Placement technique are 73.77%, 73.14% and 77% respectively. The percentage reduction of the three performance parameters per unit control force obtained using the two methods have also been estimated and compared. Pole placement technique gives higher reduction while the LQR algorithm gives more reduction per unit control force.

Publisher

IOP Publishing

Subject

General Engineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3