The impact of structuring characteristics on the launching of virtual communities of practice

Author:

Dubé Line,Bourhis Anne,Jacob Réal

Abstract

PurposeDespite the increasing popularity of virtual communities of practice (VCoPs), our understanding of how to intentionally form, develop and sustain them is still at an embryonic stage. Aims to go some way to remedying this.Design/methodology/approachInvestigates the attempt by 14 organizations to implement 18 VCoPs. Using existing documents, detailed logs, and focus groups, a large quantity of qualitative data was gathered, coded, and analyzed.FindingsThe study shows that the environment, the relevance of the VCoP's objectives to its members' daily work, and the degree to which the VCoP is embedded in the organizational structure of an organization are the three structuring characteristics most likely to explain the success or failure of a VCoP at the launching stage.Research limitations/implicationsThe focus is limited to the launching phase; further research should investigate different stages of development.Practical implicationsThe results may offer an indication as to the most important characteristics to consider at the launching stage of a VCoP. Management may want to work at changing the characteristics or take actions to counteract their obstructive effects.Originality/valueThis paper highlights the need for a contingency approach in VCoPs research and practice, and rids one of the misconception, which is pervasive in the extant literature, that all VCoPs are the same and should be managed the same way.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences

Reference34 articles.

1. American Productivity and Quality Center (APQC) (2001), Building and Sustaining Communities of Practice: Continuing Success in Knowledge Management, American Productivity and Quality Center, Houston, TX.

2. Ardichvili, A., Page, V. and Wentling, T. (2003), “Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge‐sharing communities of practice”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 64‐77.

3. Ashkenas, R., Ulrich, D., Jick, T. and Kerr, S. (1995), The Boundaryless Organization, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA.

4. Bridges, W. and Mitchell, S. (2002), “Leading transition, a new model for change”, in Hesselbein, F. and Johnston, R. (Eds), On Leading Change, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 33‐45.

5. Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (1991), “Organizational learning and communities‐of‐practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation”, Organization Science, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 40‐57.

Cited by 168 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3