Abstract
PurposeThe authors passively apply a researcher profile pitch (RPP) template tool in accounting and across a range of Business School disciplines.Design/methodology/approachThe authors document a diversity of worked examples of the RPP. Using an auto-ethnographic research design, each showcased researcher reflects on the exercise, highlighting nuanced perspectives drawn from their experience. Collectively, these examples and associated independent narratives allow the authors to identify common themes that provide informative insights to potential users.FindingsFirst, the RPP tool is helpful for accounting scholars to portray their essential research stream. Moreover, the tool proved universally meaningful and applicable irrespective of research discipline or research experience. Second, it offers a distinct advantage over existing popular research profile platforms, because it demands a focused “less”, that delivers a meaningful “more”. Further, the conciseness of the RPP design makes it readily amenable to iteration and dynamism. Third, the authors have identified specific situations of added value, e.g. initiating research collaborations and academic job market preparation.Practical implicationsThe RPP tool can provide the basis for developing a scalable interactive researcher exchange platform.Originality/valueThe authors argue that the RPP tool potentially adds meaningful incremental value relative to existing popular platforms for gaining researcher visibility. This additional value derives from the systematic RPP format, combined with the benefit of easy familiarity and strong emphasis on succinctness. Additionally, the authors argue that the RPP adds a depth of nuanced novel information often not contained in other platforms, e.g. around the dimensions of “data” and “tools”. Further, the RPP gives the researcher a “personality”, most notably through the dimensions of “contribution” and “other considerations”.
Reference35 articles.
1. Responsible science: celebrating the 50-year legacy of Ball and Brown (1968) using a registration-based framework;Pacific-Basin Finance Journal,2019
2. Interpretive and critical research in accounting: a commentary on its absence from mainstream accounting research;Critical Perspectives on Accounting,1997
3. How can accounting researchers become more innovative?;Accounting Horizons,2012
4. Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M. and Scott, J. (2015), Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit, Learned Publishing, Vol. 28, pp. 151-155, doi: 10.1087/20150211.
5. Introduction to special issue on innovations in research methods in accounting and governance;Accounting, Finance and Governance Review,2021
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献