Assessment methodology to prioritize knowledge management related activities to support organizational excellence

Author:

Bornemann Manfred,Sammer Martin

Abstract

So far, a systematic and comprehensive assessment tool to prioritize organizational development activities, especially in the currently intensely discussed domain of knowledge management is not available in the literature. Utilizing the here proposed methodology, which is derived from a four dimensional system theory based model on knowledge utilization within an organization, managerial decision makers save time and money in the early process of implementation of (pilot) knowledge management projects by prioritizing critical actions out of several options right from the beginning. The methodology stresses four levels of potential intervention, starting with the strategy focused target level, next a knowledge level covering all knowledge workers of an organization, then an action level focusing on operations and processes and finally a data level with the explicitly available stock of (digital) resources. All levels are discussed in detail. These levels are complemented by categories that help to address the organizational entities of the individual, the communication and interaction dependent team and the organization. Additionally these categories are expanded to include the corporate environment as well. By applying the resulting matrix of four levels to organizational development activities with special focus on knowledge management supporting activities, a comprehensive methodology to prioritize those development options is suggested. The methodology is illustrated by the example of the innovation process which is an appropriate starting point to improve the organizational excellence in terms of knowledge and learning.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference19 articles.

1. Arthur, B. (1996), “Increasing returns and the new world of business”, Harvard Business Review, July‐August, pp. 100‐9.

2. Davenport, T. (1998), Working Knowledge, BostonM, MA.

3. Davis, S. and Botkin, J. (1994), “The coming of knowledge‐based business”, Harvard Business Review, September‐October.

4. Drucker, P. (1993), The Post‐Capitalist Society, Harper Business, New York, NY.

5. Hansen, M.T., Nohira, N. and Thierney, Th. (1999), “What’s your strategy for managing knowledge?”, Harvard Business Review, March‐April, pp. 106‐16.

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3