Motivating and supporting collaboration in open innovation

Author:

Antikainen Maria,Mäkipää Marko,Ahonen Mikko

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore collaboration in open innovation (OI) communities. The paper focuses on the following two research problems: how can users be motivated to collaborate in OI communities and what kind of tools and methods can support collaboration in OI communities?Design/methodology/approachThe exploratory case study includes three innovation intermediaries originated in three different countries: France, The Netherlands and Finland. The primary data source consists of the open‐ended questions posted to the maintainers and users by e‐mail. The data include five responses from the maintainers and 12 responses from the users. The secondary source is the internet document review. The classification of the factors in the preliminary framework is derived from reading and rereading the answers of the respondents until the themes started emerging from the data. Thereafter, the data are coded according to the chosen themes.FindingsResults suggest that monetary rewards are not always the best way to motivate contributing users. Instead, contributors appreciate many intangible factors, such as community cooperation, learning new ideas and having entertainment. Contributors also appreciate good support and the right cooperation tools from their service provider.Research limitations/implicationsThe data are based on three cases and a limited amount of participants. Therefore, it may be that in gathering empirical data from a larger group of cases, some new factors will be found.Practical implicationsCompanies should provide community members with tools that are easy to use, allowing people to express themselves and share their personal details. It seems to be important that maintainers are involved as visible members of a community, which includes telling about themselves in a more detailed way.Originality/valueThis paper is one of the first papers focusing on the collaboration perspective of OI communities.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation

Reference73 articles.

1. Ahonen, M., Antikainen, M. and Mäkipää, M. (2007), “Supporting collective creativity”, European Academy of Management (EURAM) Conference Proceedings, IDEAD, Paris.

2. Amabile, T.M., Hennessey, B.A. and Grossman, B. (1986), “Social influences on creativity: the effects of contracted‐for reward”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 14‐23.

3. Antikainen, M. (2007), “The attraction of company online communities – a multiple case study”, Academic dissertation, Department of Management Studies, University of Tampere, Tampere.

4. Antikainen, M. and Väätäjä, H. (2008a), “Innovating is fun – motivations to participate in online open innovation communities”, in Huizingh, K.R.E., Torkkeli, M., Conn, S. and Bitran, I. (Eds), Proceedings of the First ISPIM Innovation Symposium Singapore: Managing Innovation in a Connected World, Singapore, 14‐17 December.

5. Antikainen, M. and Väätäjä, H. (2008b), “Rewarding in open innovation communities – how to motivate members?”, in Huizingh, K.R.E., Torkkeli, M., Conn, S. and Bitran, I. (Eds), Proceedings of the XIX ISPIM Annual Conference, Open Innovation: Creating Products and Services through Collaboration, Tours, 15‐18 June.

Cited by 228 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3