The critical potential of institutional theory revisited — a field study of the rationalisation of budget fairness through agentic actorhood

Author:

Ahrens Thomas,Ferry Laurence,Khalifa Rihab

Abstract

Purpose This paper seeks to contribute to the debate on the usefulness of institutional theory to critical studies. It pursues this topic by exploring some of the possibilities for allocating local authority funds more fairly for poor residents. This paper aims to shed light on the institution of budgeting in a democratically elected local government under austerity. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses world culture theory, the study of the devolution of cultural authority to individuals and organisations through which they turn into agentic actors. Based on a field study of Newcastle City Council’s (NCC’s) budget-related practices, the paper uses the notion of actorhood to explore the use of fairness in austerity budgets. Findings This paper documents how new concerns with fairness gave rise to new local authority practices and gave NCC characteristics of actorhood. This paper also shows why it might make sense for a local authority that is managing austerity budget cuts and cutting back on services to make more detailed performance information public, rather than attempting to hide service deterioration, as some prior literature suggests. This paper delineates the limits to actorhood, in this study’s case, principally the inability to overcome structural constraints of legal state power. Practical implications The paper is suggestive of ways in which local government can fight inequality in opposition to central government austerity. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first qualitative accounting study of actorhood. It coins the phrase fairness assemblage to denote a combination of various accounting technologies, organisational elements and local government practices.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Accounting,Business and International Management

Reference94 articles.

1. Financial and operational modes of accountability: differing accounts of British and German managers,1996

2. Management controls that anchor other organizational practices;Contemporary Accounting Research,2018

3. The regulation of cross-border audits of development NPOs: a legitimacy perspective;Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management,2016

4. Newcastle city council and the grassroots: accountability and budgeting under austerity;Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,2015

5. Institutional entrepreneurship, practice memory, and cultural memory: choice and creativity in the pursuit of endogenous change of local authority budgeting;Management Accounting Research,2018

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3