The examination of power and politics in a conservation organisation

Author:

Powell Lisa,Tilt Carol

Abstract

Purpose For more than three decades, researchers have been searching for evidence of corporate economic, social and environmental sustainability, the holy grail of corporate success in a socially and environmentally conscious world of the future. The vast majority of entities that researchers have investigated have focussed on the primary goal of profit maximisation, with only vaguely articulated (if any) social and environmental targets. Very little research has been undertaken to expose the inner workings of organisations that are striving primarily to improve environmental outcomes within a commercial setting. The purpose of this paper is to expose the inside details of an organisation that tried but failed, and highlights the role of power and politics in its demise. Design/methodology/approach The “processual” or “contextualist” (Burns, 2000, p. 568) methodology adopted in this investigation has facilitated the interpretation and understanding of complex inter-relationships existing amongst key management personnel. The method steps undertaken included observation and documentation of organisational strategic and operational decision-making practices over a period of 22 months and the examination and analysis of over 800 documents prepared either by or about the organisation. Findings Examining the inter-relationships of power and politics amongst key players during a period of significant change revealed an intense struggle for corporate survival between two management groups: the original “environmentalist” managers who prepared the entity for listing on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX); and, the introduced “economic rationalist” managers who guided it through the post listing phase. A failure to effectively transition the power held over resources, decision-making and meanings from the old to the new managers proved to significantly challenge the organisation and possibly contributed to its ultimate demise. Some important lessons were highlighted, particularly the need to develop and establish shared understandings. It is suggested that for a business to move closer to being sustainable, rather than allowing one of the existing paradigms to dominate, a new business model needs to emerge. Originality/value The practical implementation of conservation activities on a large commercial scale is a controversial notion. The investigation of this unique case through a period of significant change represents an important experiment in the quest for sustainability and reveals valuable lessons that may guide other organisations that follow in its wake.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Accounting

Reference92 articles.

1. Making a difference: sustainability reporting, accountability and organizational change;Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,2007

2. Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: beyond current theorising;Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,2002

3. The international integrated reporting council: a call to action;Critical Perspectives on Accounting,2015

4. Aretino, B., Holland, P., Peterson, D.C. and Schuele, M. (2001), “Creating markets for biodiversity: a case study of (the company)”, Paper No. 1676, Productivity Commission Staff Research, 5 April, Adelaide, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=282373 (accessed 29 August 2014).

5. Barter, N. and Bebbington, J. (2010), “Pursuing environmental sustainability”, Research Report No. 116, ACCA London.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. “As bad as bad can be”: accounting for species extinction in the North Pacific;Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal;2023-05-02

2. Accounting practices and professional power dynamics during a crisis;The British Accounting Review;2022-05

3. New Business Models Sustainability;Advances in Logistics, Operations, and Management Science;2021

4. Meaning of “employee happiness” within the context of complex organisations? An explanatory review on the UAE labour force;Rajagiri Management Journal;2020-07-24

5. Reforms and budgetary oversight roles in Tanzania;Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management;2019-12-24

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3