Author:
Antimiani Alessandro,Costantini Valeria
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyse the role of the enlargement process of the European Union as a factor fostering international competitiveness of EU Member States. The paper argues that the economic integration process has reduced the technological gap between old and new EU Member States, and this pattern of technological innovation can partially explain the strong impulse on the export dynamics of European countries.Design/methodology/approachThe paper builds an augmented gravity model by including the role of technological innovation, proxied by the stock of knowledge at the sector level. The authors gather together information on patents applied to international offices and bilateral export flows available from COMTRADE dataset.FindingsBy using a dynamic panel data estimator the authors find three main empirical evidences. First, the enlargement process has produced an overall larger positive impact on export flows for new Members than for old ones, and more importantly that sectors with the higher technological content have received the strongest impulse. Second, the augmented gravity model allows shaping the crucial role of technological innovation in fostering export competitiveness. Third, this impact seems to be stronger for old EU Member States than for new ones.Research limitations/implicationsThe major limitation concerns time span adopted in this work. By expanding the dataset to further years it could be possible to better disentangle the effects also related to the new wave of the EU enlargement.Social implicationsThe policy implication derived is that the more the new EU Members catch up technologically as a result of the integration process, the more they will benefit in terms of economic development.Originality/valueThe major originality of this paper is the construction of an augmented gravity model by including the role of technological innovation, applied to distinguished manufacturing sectors in a dynamic panel setting.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference81 articles.
1. Abramovitz, M. (1986), “Catching‐up, forging ahead, and falling behind”, The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 385‐406.
2. Allard, C. (2009), “Competitiveness in central‐Europe: what happened since EU accession?”, IMF Working Paper, WP/09/121.
3. Amable, B. (2000), “International specialization and growth”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 413‐432.
4. Anderson, J. (1979), “A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation”, American Economic Review, Vol. 69, pp. 106‐116.
5. Anderson, J. and van Wincoop, E. (2003), “Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle”, American Economic Review, Vol. 93, pp. 170‐192.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献