Wikipedia at university: what faculty think and do about it

Author:

Aibar Eduard,Lladós-Masllorens Josep,Meseguer-Artola Antoni,Minguillón Julià,Lerga Maura

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate university faculty perceptions and practices of using Wikipedia as a teaching resource. Design/methodology/approach – This study is based on a large survey to all faculty members in two large public universities. A total of 913 valid responses were collected through an online questionnaire with 9 control variables and 41 Likert-scaled questions. Findings – The results do not support an overwhelming sceptical attitude among faculty towards Wikipedia. The overall quality of Wikipedia articles is highly valued and most faculty are regular users, just as students are. Though most faculty show a positive view on the teaching usefulness of Wikipedia, few of them actually use it for teaching purposes. A certain conflict has been detected between standard academic procedures of knowledge building and the open collaborative model on which Wikipedia rests. In the end, two important factors play a role in shaping faculty views: their colleagues’ perceived opinions and practices, and academic disciplines. Research limitations/implications – The survey has only been conducted in two universities. More institutions are needed to broaden the scope. Originality/value – The authors have gathered a greater number of answers than those collected in previous studies. The questionnaire is also very extensive. The survey has been addressed to all faculty members at one online university and at one standard brick-and-mortar university.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications

Reference21 articles.

1. Alonso, M.I. and García, J. (2013), “Colaboración activa en Wikipedia como método de aprendizaje”, Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia , Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 13-26.

2. An, Y. and Williams, K. (2010), “Teaching with Web 2.0 technologies: benefits, barriers and lessons learned”, International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning , Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 41-58.

3. Antin, J. , Yee, R. , Cheshire, C. and Nov, O. (2011), “Gender differences in Wikipedia editing”, Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, Mountain View, CA, ACM, New York, NY , pp. 11-14.

4. Bayliss, G. (2013), “Exploring the cautionary attitude toward Wikipedia in higher education: implications for higher education institutions”, New Review of Academic Librarianship , Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 36-57.

5. Benkler, Y. (2006), The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom , Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

Cited by 44 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3