Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to explore to what extent employees' mental well-being affects their productivity while working from home (WFH) during the COVID-19 crisis and whether mental well-being and productivity differ across some socio-demographic factors.Design/methodology/approachA cross-sectional study with online questionnaires was designed with 472 valid responses in Indonesia. Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) and Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (IWPQ) were administered. Non-parametric tests and structural equation modeling were employed to analyze the data.FindingsThe prevalence of depression was 18.4%, anxiety 46.4% and stress 13.1%, with relatively good productivity. Gender, age, education level, job experiences, marital status, number of children and nature of the organization were associated with the employees' psychological health but not with their productivity, while the workspace availability influenced both outcomes. The study path model showed the negative correlation between WFH employees' psychological well-being and productivity.Research limitations/implicationsThis study may contribute to the implication of current mandatory WFH on mental well-being and productivity. Further studies need to address the representativeness and generalizability issues as well as incorporating potential stressors.Practical implicationsOrganizations may adopt WFH as a future working arrangement and identify the individual and occupational characteristics that provide the most impacts on productivity. It is also necessary for them to develop proper strategies to mitigate the psychological risks and overcome the WFH challenges.Originality/valueThere is still a lack of studies investigating the relationship between simultaneous effects of WFH on psychological well-being and productivity, and how they affect some socio-demographic variables in the context of COVID-19.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference99 articles.
1. Afshar, V. (2020), “Working from home: average productivity loss of remote work is 1%”, available at: https://www.zdnet.com/article/the-average-productivity-loss-of-remote-work-is-1/ (accessed 8 June 2020).
2. How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings;Psychological Science in the Public Interest,2015
3. Effectiveness of large-scale social restrictions (PSBB) toward the new normal era during COVID-19 outbreak: a mini policy review;Journal of Indonesian Health Policy and Administration,2020
4. Barrot, J.N., Grassi, B. and Sauvagnat, J. (2020), “Sectoral effects of social distancing”, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3569446.
5. Indonesians must have their maids;The Jakarta Post,2016
Cited by
45 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献