Governance structure choice in strategic alliances

Author:

Teng Bing‐Sheng,Das T.K.

Abstract

PurposeStrategic alliances have a variety of governance structures that can be broadly classified as joint ventures, minority equity alliances, and contractual alliances. This paper seeks to empirically examine the roles of four key determinants of governance structure choice, namely, joint R&D and joint marketing objectives, alliance management experience, and international partners.Design/methodology/approachSeveral hypotheses are developed regarding governance structure choice and are tested with data from 765 alliances. A multinomial logistic regression (logit) model is used for statistical analysis, with five control variables.FindingsAll hypotheses are supported, so that the roles of alliance objectives, alliance management experience, and international partners are demonstrated as being significant as determinants of governance structure choice in alliances.Research limitations/implicationsLimitations stem from the data being from a single source, one that also relies on press announcements that may be biased toward larger alliances.Practical implicationsBriefly, alliance managers should find it useful to assess the relative presence of the four determinants of structural choice studied in this investigation in order to make an informed selection of the appropriate governance structure.Originality/valueThe study contributes to the knowledge of the key determinants of governance structure choice in strategic alliances by examining empirically, with a large sample of alliances from various industries, the significant roles of four factors, namely, joint R&D and joint marketing objectives, alliance management experience, and international partners.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference65 articles.

1. Alliance Analyst (1994), Newcap Communications, Alliance Analyst, Philadelphia, PA.

2. Anand, B.N. and Khanna, T. (2000), “Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, pp. 295‐315.

3. Athanassiou, N. and Nigh, D. (2000), “Internationalization, tacit knowledge and the top management teams of MNCs”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 31, pp. 471‐87.

4. Barkema, H.G., Shenkar, O., Vermeulen, F. and Bell, J.H.J. (1997), “Working abroad, working with others: how firms learn to operate international joint ventures”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40, pp. 426‐42.

5. Baughn, C.C., Denekamp, J.G., Stevens, J.H. and Osborn, R.N. (1997), “Protecting intellectual capital in international alliances”, Journal of World Business, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 103‐17.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3