Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the influence of organizational factors on individual decision-making under conditions of uncertainty and time pressure. A method to assess the impact of individual and organizational factors on individual decisions is proposed and experimented in the context of triage decision-making process.
Design/methodology/approach
The adopted methodology is based on the bias-variance decomposition formula. The method, usually applied to assess the predictive accuracy of heuristics, has been adjusted to discriminate between the impact of organizational and individual factors affecting heuristic processes. To test the methodology, 25 clinical scenarios have been designed and submitted, through simulations, to the triage nurses of two Spanish hospitals.
Findings
Nurses’ decisions are affected by organizational factors in certain task conditions, such as situations characterized by complete and coherent information. When relevant information is lacking and available information is not coherent, decision-makers base their assessments on their personal experience and gut feeling.
Research limitations/implications
Discriminating between the influence of organizational factors and individual ones is the starting point for a more in-depth understanding of how organization can guide the decision process. Using simulations of clinical scenarios in field research does not allow for capturing the influence of some contextual factors, such as the nurses’ stress levels, on individual decisions. This issue will be addressed in further research.
Practical implications
Bias and variance are useful measurements for detecting process improvement actions. A bias prevalence requires a re-design of organizational settings, whereas training would be preferred when variance prevails.
Originality/value
The main contribution of this work concerns the novel interpretation of bias and variance concepts to assess organizational factors’ influence on heuristic decision-making processes, taking into account the level of complexity of decision-related tasks.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference91 articles.
1. Untangling self-reinforcing processes in managerial decision making. Co-evolving heuristics?;Management Decision,2014
2. Too many to handle? Two types of multimarket contacts and entry decisions;Management Decision,2015
3. Collaboration dynamics in healthcare knowledge intensive processes: a state of the art on sociometric badges;Digital Technology and Organizational Change, Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation,2018
4. Arnott, D. (2002), “A taxonomy of decision biases”, Technical Report No. 2002/01, Decision Support Systems Laboratory, Monash University, Melbourne, available at: http://dsslab.sims.monash.edu.au/taxonomy.pdf (accessed October 25, 2017).
5. Cognitive biases and decision support systems development: a design science approach;Information Systems Journal,2006
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献