Recuperative Care: an example of partnership care which works for patients

Author:

Morrissey Yvonne,Coxon Kirstie,Carpenter Iain

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to evaluate the role of Recuperative Care after hospital discharge.Design/methodology/approachA combined qualitative and quantitative study. The quantitative study was a concurrent, parallel, geographically controlled trial of Recuperative Care versus standard NHS hospital rehabilitation. Recuperative Care is rehabilitation in a residential care home with no on‐site medical or nursing staff. A daily programme of exercises and activities to improve independence is provided by two in‐house occupational therapists. The primary outcome measures were discharge destination, domicile 3 and 12 months post‐discharge and mortality. A purposefully selected sample of 20 recuperative care patients was interviewed after discharge.FindingsThere was a small difference of borderline significance in initial discharge destination (slightly more patients were discharged home from recuperative care than from Hospital). However, at 3 months and 12 months there was no significant difference between the groups. A logistic regression analysis suggested the main determinant of outcome was cognitive function. There was no significant difference in mortality between the groups. The qualitative data demonstrated Recuperative Care to be a highly‐rated, positive and sometimes life‐changing experience for patients. The interview data illustrate the aspects of care and characteristics which were beneficial.Practical implicationsRecuperative care is a model of partnership working which has potential to free‐up hospital beds while benefitting patients.Originality/valueThe presentation of the qualitative data aims to highlight those aspects of Recuperative Care which seemed beneficial from a clinical perspective.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Health (social science)

Reference27 articles.

1. Appleby, J., Ham, C., Imison, C. and Jennings, M. (2010), Improving NHS Productivity: More with the Same Not More of the Same, The King's Fund, London.

2. Audit Commission (1997), The Coming of Age: Improving Care Services for Older People, Audit Commission, Abingdon.

3. Bond, J., Gregson, B.A. and Atkinson, A. (1989), “Measurement of outcomes within a multi‐centred randomised controlled trial in the evaluation of the experimental NHS nursing home”, Age and Ageing, Vol. 18, pp. 292‐302.

4. CESSA (1991), Inside Quality Assurance, Centre for Environmental and Social Studies in Ageing, Polytechnic of North London, London.

5. Challiner, Y.C.M. (1991), “Measuring and improving quality of life in long‐term care for the elderly”, MD thesis, University of London, London.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3