Abstract
PurposeUsing evidence from Brunei Darussalam, Malaysia and Indonesia, the purpose of this paper is to explore how Islamic welfare regime notion evolves in a South East Asian (SEA) context.Design/methodology/approachTo gain a broad frame of reference in discussing Islamic welfare regimes in SEA, this paper employs a combined political-economic and cultural approach to analyze how Islamic welfare ethics in Brunei Darussalam, Malaysia and Indonesia are developed. The specific criterion used to make a comparative analysis of these countries is an interconnection between four levels of Islamic welfare actors (state, market, community and household/relatives) in providing social welfare.FindingsMalaysia and Indonesia have demonstrated the most balanced form of “Islamic welfare diamond” in the relationship between welfare actors, even as the state-centered welfare initiative continues to be expanded, while Brunei has taken a different route. A monarchical political system underpinned by high economic growth has enabled the state to play a major role in welfare distribution, rather than other welfare actors. For this reason, Malaysia and Indonesia are described as having an “Islamic inclusive welfare regime,” while Brunei is reported to have an “Islamic welfare state regime.”Originality/valueFor the purpose of theoretical advancements, there is no doubt that this paper has proposed an alternative framework to developing an understanding of how the Islamic ethical code is articulated in a wide range of welfare configurations within the “South East Asian context.”
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Sociology and Political Science
Reference50 articles.
1. East Asian welfare regime: obsolete ideal-type or diversified;Journal of Asian Public Policy,2016
2. Asian Development Bank (2019), “Social protection expenditure in Asia and the Pacific”, available at: https://data.adb.org/dataset/social-protection-expenditure-asia-and-pacific (accessed March 4, 2019).
3. The East Asian welfare model;International Journal of Social Welfare,2006
4. Zakat and taxation: a conceptual comparison;IKIM Journal of Islam and the Contemporary World,2008
5. Deconstructing Asian welfare model: social equality matters;Journal of Asian Public Policy,2008
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献