Abstract
Purpose
– This paper aims to determine if there is a spatial dependence in the entrepreneurial activity among countries. The existence of a “digital proximity” could explain the spatial pattern of entrepreneurship.
Design/methodology/approach
– This question is empirically addressed by using a five-period, 2008-2012, panel data for 35 countries. A spatial fixed effects panel data model is estimated by using the total entrepreneurial activity published by the global entrepreneurship monitor as the dependent variable.
Findings
– A significant negative influence of the digital proximity on the entrepreneurial activity is observed. Mobile broadband (MB) direct effect is positive while the indirect effect (the spatial spillovers) is negative, leading to a negative total effect on the total entrepreneurial activity. This result is contrary to non-spatial models’ results. Besides, a higher MB penetration in a country would lead to a competitive advantage fostering its opportunities for entrepreneurship, but reducing those of its neighbours’.
Originality/value
– This paper examines the relationship between information and communication technology (ICT) and entrepreneurship, by introducing the spatial effects is the main contribution. This paper expands the scant literature on the ICT impact on entrepreneurship. Results obtained support policies towards enforcing innovation, education and reducing entry regulations for encouraging entrepreneurship. Meanwhile, MB policies could counteract the entrepreneurial policies’ results due to the spatial dependence.
Subject
Geography, Planning and Development
Reference81 articles.
1. Acs, Z.
,
O’Gorman, C.
,
Szerb, L.
and
Terjesen, S.
(2007), “Could the Irish miracle be repeated in Hungary”,
Small Business Economics
, Vol. 28 Nos 2/3, pp. 123-142.
2. Adegoke, Y.
(2003),
Financial Times
, 7
November.
3. Alderete, M.V.
(2014), “ICT incidence on the entrepreneurial activity at country level”,
International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business
, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 183-201.
4. Ancot, L.
,
Paelinck, J.
,
Klaassen, L.
and
Molle, W.
(1982), “Topics in regional development modelling”,
Albegov, M.
,
Andersson, A.E.
and
Snickars, F.
(Eds),
Regional Development Modelling in Theory and Practice
, Amsterdam, North Holland.
5. Anselin, L.
(1988),
Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models
, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献