Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to alert services marketers that a new methodology exists for researching many of the components of the consumer decision making process.Design/methodology/approachThis methodology involves the use of real‐time measurements of neural (brain) activity associated with the presentation of various marketing stimuli. Instead of relying on traditional inferential associations to explain consumer behavior, this approach provides direct correlational associations.FindingsThe ability to examine what specific brain function or functions are activated during various stages of the consumer's decision‐making process should help service marketers improve their efficiency and effectiveness. While neuromarketing has applications to all forms of product marketing, it is of particular interest to services marketers because of the intangible nature of services; thus making conventional research more difficult and speculative.Research limitations/implicationsInformation for this paper was gathered from a variety of literature resources because the use of neural imaging has been used in many different physical and social sciences such as medicine, economics, political science, marketing, and psychology. While a few specific examples of using neuromarketing for the marketing of services exist, most are proprietary. This limits the generalizability of this paper currently but hopefully does not diminish interest in an area of research that has great potential for helping to answer many difficult questions.Originality/valueServices marketers are encouraged to follow the technique as it evolves from medical procedure to marketing procedure.
Reference22 articles.
1. Camerer, C., Lowenstein, G. and Prelec, D. (2004), “Neuroeconomics: why economics needs brains”, Journal of Economics, Vol. 106 No. 3, pp. 555‐79.
2. duPlessis, E. (2005), The Advertised Mind: Ground Breaking Insights into How Our Brains Respond to Advertising, Kogan Page, London.
3. Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U. and Kosfeld, M. (2005), “Neuroeconomic foundation of trust and social preferences: initial evidence”, American Economic Review, Vol. 95 No. 2, pp. 346‐51.
4. Friedman, R.A. (2006), “What's the ultimate? Scan a male brain”, New York Times, Vol. 156 No. 53743, p. G10.
5. Glimcher, P. (2003), Decisions, Uncertainty and the Brain: The Science of Neuroeconomics, MIT Press, London.
Cited by
46 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献