Becoming a leader: the challenge of modesty for women

Author:

Budworth Marie‐Hélène,Mann Sara L.

Abstract

PurposeWhile the number of women in managerial positions has been increasing, the gender composition of top management teams is skewed. There are barriers and obstacles in place that limit the movement of women into leadership roles. The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between modesty and access to leadership. Specifically, tendencies toward modesty and lack of self‐promotion are hypothesized to perpetuate the lack of female involvement in top management positions.Design/methodology/approachThe literature on modesty and self‐promotion is reviewed. The findings are discussed in terms of the persistent challenges faced by women with regard to their ability to enter senior levels of management.FindingsThe overall message of the paper is that behaviours that are successful for males in the workplace are not successful for females. The good news is that women do not need to adopt male ways of being in order to succeed. A limitation is that the paper is largely “uni‐cultural”, as the research referenced is primarily that undertaken in a North American context. Self‐promotion and modesty may be conceptualized differently in other contexts.Originality/valueThe paper is one of the first to focus on modesty, an important gendered individual difference, to explain persistent workplace inequalities.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Reference37 articles.

1. Ayman, R. (2004), “Situational and contingency approaches to leadership”, in Antonakis, J., Cianciolo, A.K. and Sternberg, R.J. (Eds), The Nature of Leadership, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 148‐70.

2. Bandura, A. (1986), Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

3. Bartol, K.M. and Martin, D.C. (1986), “Women and men in task groups”, in Ashmore, R.D. and Del Boca, F.K. (Eds), The Social Psychology of Female‐Male Relations, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp. 259‐310.

4. Beall, A.E., Eagly, A.H. and Sternberg, R.J. (2004), “Introduction”, in Eagly, A.H., Beall, A.E. and Sternberg, R.J. (Eds), The Psychology of Gender, 2nd ed., Guilford Press, New York, NY, pp. 1‐8.

5. Berg, J.H., Stephan, W.G. and Dodson, M. (1981), “Attributional modesty in women”, Psychology of Women Quarterly, Vol. 5 No. 5, pp. 711‐27.

Cited by 46 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3