Author:
Caruana Albert,Ramaseshan B.,Ewing Michael T.
Abstract
Reports that the increased calls for transparency and accountability in government organizations underscores the need for a market orientation even among government departments. Considers the degree of market orientation and its effect on the organizational commitment in government departments in the Australian public sector. Results provide empirical support for a relationship between market orientation in the public sector and organizational commitment. Draws implications from and discusses directions for future research.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Political Science and International Relations,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference43 articles.
1. Allen, N.J. and Meyer, J.P. (1990, “The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, Vol. 63, pp. 1‐18.
2. Armstrong, J.S. and Overton, T.S. (1977, “Estimating non response bias in mail surveys”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XIV, August, pp. 396‐402.
3. Becker, H.S. (1960, “Notes on the concept of commitment”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 66, pp. 32‐42.
4. Bourn, J. (1992, “Evaluating the performance of central government”, in Plooitt, C. and Harrison, S., Handbook of Public Service Management, Blackwell, Reading, MA.
5. Churchill, G.A. Jr. (1979, “A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XVI, February, pp. 64‐73.
Cited by
37 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献