Author:
Badri Masood A.,Abdulla Mohammed H.
Abstract
This paper examines how institutions of higher education might operationalize faculty performance evaluation in terms of research, teaching, and university and community service. An analytic hierarchy process model is developed and presented, allowing decision makers to couple performance evaluation and academic reward/awards and recognitions offered by institutions of higher education, and provides an objective way to compare faculty members. Weights are provided for each of the criteria in the evaluation process for a more objective outcome. Reward/award systems might include promotion decisions, merit pay, tenure, long‐term contracts, and annual reward/awards of excellence in research, teaching or service. The model might be used to make judgment on the qualification of candidates for such systems, and could be used on the department level, college level, or university‐wide level. In addition, the model could rank faculty members within each discipline or major. An illustrative example is provided of the model at the United Arab Emirates University.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education
Reference71 articles.
1. Alpert, D. (1985), “Performance and paralysis: the organizational context of the American research university”, Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 56 No. 3, pp. 241‐81.
2. Barnett, L. (1996), “Are teaching evaluation questionnaires valid? Assessing the evidence”, Journal of Collective Negotiations, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 335‐49.
3. Braskamp, L. (1983), Guidebook for Evaluating Teaching, Measurement and Research Division, Office of Instructional Resources, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
4. Bray, J. and Howard, G. (1980), “Methodological consideration in the evaluation of a teacher‐training program”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 72 No. 1, pp. 62‐70.
5. Brightman, H. (1987), “Towards teaching excellence in the decision sciences”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 646‐61.
Cited by
37 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献