Author:
Coxworth James E.,Kim Peter S.,McQueen John S.,Hawkes Kristen
Abstract
The evolution of distinctively human life history and social organization is generally attributed to paternal provisioning based on pair bonds. Here we develop an alternative argument that connects the evolution of human pair bonds to the male-biased mating sex ratios that accompanied the evolution of human life history. We simulate an agent-based model of the grandmother hypothesis, compare simulated sex ratios to data on great apes and human hunter–gatherers, and note associations between a preponderance of males and mate guarding across taxa. Then we explore a recent model that highlights the importance of mating sex ratios for differences between birds and mammals and conclude that lessons for human evolution cannot ignore mammalian reproductive constraints. In contradiction to our claim that male-biased sex ratios are characteristically human, female-biased ratios are reported in some populations. We consider the likelihood that fertile men are undercounted and conclude that the mate-guarding hypothesis for human pair bonds gains strength from explicit links with our grandmothering life history.
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference103 articles.
1. Trivers R (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871–1971, ed Campbell B (Aldine, Chicago), pp 139–179
2. An evolutionary life-history framework for understanding sex differences in human mortality rates
3. Men: good health and high mortality. Sex differences in health and aging
4. Robson SL van Schaik CP Hawkes K (2006) The derived features of human life history. The Evolution of Human Life History, eds Hawkes K Paine R (SAR, Santa Fe, NM), pp 17–44
5. Age-related patterns of reproductive success among female mountain gorillas
Cited by
41 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献