Abstract
We analyze the adoption of nonpharmaceutical interventions in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries during the early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Given the complexity associated with pandemic decisions, governments are faced with the dilemma of how to act quickly when their core decision-making processes are based on deliberations balancing political considerations. Our findings show that, in times of severe crisis, governments follow the lead of others and base their decisions on what other countries do. Governments in countries with a stronger democratic structure are slower to react in the face of the pandemic but are more sensitive to the influence of other countries. We provide insights for research on international policy diffusion and research on the political consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference58 articles.
1. N. G. Davies ., The effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 cases, deaths and demand for hospital services in the UK: A modelling study. medRxiv:10.1101/2020.04.01.20049908 (6 April 2020).
2. N. Ferguson ., “Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand” (Tech. Rep. 9, Imperial College London, 2020).
3. F. E. Alvarez , D. Argente , F. Lippi , A Simple Planning Problem for Covid-19 Lockdown, (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2020).
4. M. S. Eichenbaum , S. Rebelo , M. Trabandt , The Macroeconomics of Epidemics, (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2020).
5. G. Briscese , N. Lacetera , M. Macis , M. Tonin , Compliance with Covid-19 Social-Distancing Measures in Italy: The Role of Expectations and Duration, (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2020).
Cited by
154 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献